diff options
author | Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> | 2009-09-21 14:47:50 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com> | 2009-09-24 22:33:18 +0400 |
commit | 3bc303c254335dbd7c7012cc1760b12f1d5514d3 (patch) | |
tree | 7da17fbfd697216d9ed0ccd64ea9c03aaf3d52c1 /fs/cifs/transport.c | |
parent | 48541bd3dd4739b4d574b44ea47660c88d833677 (diff) | |
download | linux-3bc303c254335dbd7c7012cc1760b12f1d5514d3.tar.xz |
cifs: convert oplock breaks to use slow_work facility (try #4)
This is the fourth respin of the patch to convert oplock breaks to
use the slow_work facility.
A customer of ours was testing a backport of one of the earlier
patchsets, and hit a "Busy inodes after umount..." problem. An oplock
break job had raced with a umount, and the superblock got torn down and
its memory reused. When the oplock break job tried to dereference the
inode->i_sb, the kernel oopsed.
This patchset has the oplock break job hold an inode and vfsmount
reference until the oplock break completes. With this, there should be
no need to take a tcon reference (the vfsmount implicitly holds one
already).
Currently, when an oplock break comes in there's a chance that the
oplock break job won't occur if the allocation of the oplock_q_entry
fails. There are also some rather nasty races in the allocation and
handling these structs.
Rather than allocating oplock queue entries when an oplock break comes
in, add a few extra fields to the cifsFileInfo struct. Get rid of the
dedicated cifs_oplock_thread as well and queue the oplock break job to
the slow_work thread pool.
This approach also has the advantage that the oplock break jobs can
potentially run in parallel rather than be serialized like they are
today.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/cifs/transport.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/cifs/transport.c | 50 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 50 deletions
diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c index 1da4ab250eae..07b8e71544ee 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/transport.c +++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c @@ -103,56 +103,6 @@ DeleteMidQEntry(struct mid_q_entry *midEntry) mempool_free(midEntry, cifs_mid_poolp); } -struct oplock_q_entry * -AllocOplockQEntry(struct inode *pinode, __u16 fid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon) -{ - struct oplock_q_entry *temp; - if ((pinode == NULL) || (tcon == NULL)) { - cERROR(1, ("Null parms passed to AllocOplockQEntry")); - return NULL; - } - temp = (struct oplock_q_entry *) kmem_cache_alloc(cifs_oplock_cachep, - GFP_KERNEL); - if (temp == NULL) - return temp; - else { - temp->pinode = pinode; - temp->tcon = tcon; - temp->netfid = fid; - spin_lock(&cifs_oplock_lock); - list_add_tail(&temp->qhead, &cifs_oplock_list); - spin_unlock(&cifs_oplock_lock); - } - return temp; -} - -void DeleteOplockQEntry(struct oplock_q_entry *oplockEntry) -{ - spin_lock(&cifs_oplock_lock); - /* should we check if list empty first? */ - list_del(&oplockEntry->qhead); - spin_unlock(&cifs_oplock_lock); - kmem_cache_free(cifs_oplock_cachep, oplockEntry); -} - - -void DeleteTconOplockQEntries(struct cifsTconInfo *tcon) -{ - struct oplock_q_entry *temp; - - if (tcon == NULL) - return; - - spin_lock(&cifs_oplock_lock); - list_for_each_entry(temp, &cifs_oplock_list, qhead) { - if ((temp->tcon) && (temp->tcon == tcon)) { - list_del(&temp->qhead); - kmem_cache_free(cifs_oplock_cachep, temp); - } - } - spin_unlock(&cifs_oplock_lock); -} - static int smb_sendv(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct kvec *iov, int n_vec) { |