diff options
| author | Aleksi Torhamo <aleksi@torhamo.net> | 2013-01-09 22:08:48 +0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> | 2013-01-13 12:07:46 +0400 |
| commit | 43f789792e2c7ea2bff37195e4c4b4239e9e02b7 (patch) | |
| tree | 9f8dfb6f8d727b231f573483c15db30232c16b47 /drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau | |
| parent | d19528a9e4f220519c2cb3f56ef0c84ead3ee440 (diff) | |
| download | linux-43f789792e2c7ea2bff37195e4c4b4239e9e02b7.tar.xz | |
drm/nvc0/fb: fix crash when different mutex is used to protect same list
Fixes regression introduced in commit 861d2107
"drm/nouveau/fb: merge fb/vram and port to subdev interfaces"
nv50_fb_vram_{new,del} functions were changed to use
nouveau_subdev->mutex instead of the old nouveau_mm->mutex.
nvc0_fb_vram_new still uses the nouveau_mm->mutex, but nvc0 doesn't
have its own fb_vram_del function, using nv50_fb_vram_del instead.
Because of this, on nvc0 a different mutex ends up being used to protect
additions and deletions to the same list.
This patch is a -stable candidate for 3.7.
Signed-off-by: Aleksi Torhamo <aleksi@torhamo.net>
Reported-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet@student.tudelft.nl>
Tested-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet@student.tudelft.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c index 306bdf121452..7606ed15b6fa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c @@ -145,14 +145,14 @@ nvc0_fb_vram_new(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, u64 size, u32 align, u32 ncmin, mem->memtype = type; mem->size = size; - mutex_lock(&mm->mutex); + mutex_lock(&pfb->base.mutex); do { if (back) ret = nouveau_mm_tail(mm, 1, size, ncmin, align, &r); else ret = nouveau_mm_head(mm, 1, size, ncmin, align, &r); if (ret) { - mutex_unlock(&mm->mutex); + mutex_unlock(&pfb->base.mutex); pfb->ram.put(pfb, &mem); return ret; } @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ nvc0_fb_vram_new(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, u64 size, u32 align, u32 ncmin, list_add_tail(&r->rl_entry, &mem->regions); size -= r->length; } while (size); - mutex_unlock(&mm->mutex); + mutex_unlock(&pfb->base.mutex); r = list_first_entry(&mem->regions, struct nouveau_mm_node, rl_entry); mem->offset = (u64)r->offset << 12; |