diff options
| author | Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> | 2014-11-10 11:33:56 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2014-11-26 16:40:45 +0300 |
| commit | d3fccc7ef831d1d829b4da5eaa081db55b1e38f3 (patch) | |
| tree | b6c81a616eb4a7a43a6fa4641c6554f4d25955b2 /arch/x86 | |
| parent | bb55e9b131d70ab9e30d73ab1342ad4907f9e0de (diff) | |
| download | linux-d3fccc7ef831d1d829b4da5eaa081db55b1e38f3.tar.xz | |
kvm: fix kvm_is_mmio_pfn() and rename to kvm_is_reserved_pfn()
This reverts commit 85c8555ff0 ("KVM: check for !is_zero_pfn() in
kvm_is_mmio_pfn()") and renames the function to kvm_is_reserved_pfn.
The problem being addressed by the patch above was that some ARM code
based the memory mapping attributes of a pfn on the return value of
kvm_is_mmio_pfn(), whose name indeed suggests that such pfns should
be mapped as device memory.
However, kvm_is_mmio_pfn() doesn't do quite what it says on the tin,
and the existing non-ARM users were already using it in a way which
suggests that its name should probably have been 'kvm_is_reserved_pfn'
from the beginning, e.g., whether or not to call get_page/put_page on
it etc. This means that returning false for the zero page is a mistake
and the patch above should be reverted.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c index ac1c4de3a484..978f402006ee 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c @@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ static int mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(u64 *sptep) * kvm mmu, before reclaiming the page, we should * unmap it from mmu first. */ - WARN_ON(!kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn) && !page_count(pfn_to_page(pfn))); + WARN_ON(!kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn) && !page_count(pfn_to_page(pfn))); if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask) kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn); @@ -2461,7 +2461,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, spte |= PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK; if (tdp_enabled) spte |= kvm_x86_ops->get_mt_mask(vcpu, gfn, - kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn)); + kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn)); if (host_writable) spte |= SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE; @@ -2737,7 +2737,7 @@ static void transparent_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, * PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL and there would be no adjustment done * here. */ - if (!is_error_noslot_pfn(pfn) && !kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn) && + if (!is_error_noslot_pfn(pfn) && !kvm_is_reserved_pfn(pfn) && level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL && PageTransCompound(pfn_to_page(pfn)) && !has_wrprotected_page(vcpu->kvm, gfn, PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL)) { |