diff options
author | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> | 2020-12-28 17:16:53 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> | 2020-12-28 17:16:53 +0300 |
commit | f81325a05e9317f09a2e4ec57a52e4e49eb42b54 (patch) | |
tree | a5a91589c9ef8e212f2899f1462cfb5c3f0130ef /Documentation/dev-tools | |
parent | 671ee4db952449acde126965bf76817a3159040d (diff) | |
parent | 5c8fe583cce542aa0b84adc939ce85293de36e5e (diff) | |
download | linux-f81325a05e9317f09a2e4ec57a52e4e49eb42b54.tar.xz |
Merge tag 'v5.11-rc1' into asoc-5.11
Linux 5.11-rc1
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/dev-tools')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 269 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kgdb.rst | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst | 18 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 93 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/ubsan.rst | 1 |
8 files changed, 282 insertions, 119 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst index 74c5e6aeeff5..9c454de5a7f7 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst @@ -224,14 +224,21 @@ you may want to use:: rm -f err.log export COCCI=scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci - make coccicheck DEBUG_FILE="err.log" MODE=report SPFLAGS="--profile --show-trying" M=./drivers/mfd/arizona-irq.c + make coccicheck DEBUG_FILE="err.log" MODE=report SPFLAGS="--profile --show-trying" M=./drivers/mfd err.log will now have the profiling information, while stdout will provide some progress information as Coccinelle moves forward with work. +NOTE: + DEBUG_FILE support is only supported when using coccinelle >= 1.0.2. +Currently, DEBUG_FILE support is only available to check folders, and +not single files. This is because checking a single file requires spatch +to be called twice leading to DEBUG_FILE being set both times to the same value, +giving rise to an error. + .cocciconfig support -------------------- diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst index 2b68addaadcd..0fc3fb1860c4 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst @@ -4,13 +4,16 @@ The Kernel Address Sanitizer (KASAN) Overview -------- -KernelAddressSANitizer (KASAN) is a dynamic memory error detector designed to -find out-of-bound and use-after-free bugs. KASAN has two modes: generic KASAN -(similar to userspace ASan) and software tag-based KASAN (similar to userspace -HWASan). +KernelAddressSANitizer (KASAN) is a dynamic memory safety error detector +designed to find out-of-bound and use-after-free bugs. KASAN has three modes: -KASAN uses compile-time instrumentation to insert validity checks before every -memory access, and therefore requires a compiler version that supports that. +1. generic KASAN (similar to userspace ASan), +2. software tag-based KASAN (similar to userspace HWASan), +3. hardware tag-based KASAN (based on hardware memory tagging). + +Software KASAN modes (1 and 2) use compile-time instrumentation to insert +validity checks before every memory access, and therefore require a compiler +version that supports that. Generic KASAN is supported in both GCC and Clang. With GCC it requires version 8.3.0 or later. Any supported Clang version is compatible, but detection of @@ -18,8 +21,8 @@ out-of-bounds accesses for global variables is only supported since Clang 11. Tag-based KASAN is only supported in Clang. -Currently generic KASAN is supported for the x86_64, arm64, xtensa, s390 and -riscv architectures, and tag-based KASAN is supported only for arm64. +Currently generic KASAN is supported for the x86_64, arm, arm64, xtensa, s390 +and riscv architectures, and tag-based KASAN modes are supported only for arm64. Usage ----- @@ -28,30 +31,22 @@ To enable KASAN configure kernel with:: CONFIG_KASAN = y -and choose between CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC (to enable generic KASAN) and -CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS (to enable software tag-based KASAN). +and choose between CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC (to enable generic KASAN), +CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS (to enable software tag-based KASAN), and +CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS (to enable hardware tag-based KASAN). + +For software modes, you also need to choose between CONFIG_KASAN_OUTLINE and +CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE. Outline and inline are compiler instrumentation types. +The former produces smaller binary while the latter is 1.1 - 2 times faster. -You also need to choose between CONFIG_KASAN_OUTLINE and CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE. -Outline and inline are compiler instrumentation types. The former produces -smaller binary while the latter is 1.1 - 2 times faster. +Both software KASAN modes work with both SLUB and SLAB memory allocators, +while the hardware tag-based KASAN currently only support SLUB. -Both KASAN modes work with both SLUB and SLAB memory allocators. -For better bug detection and nicer reporting, enable CONFIG_STACKTRACE. +For better error reports that include stack traces, enable CONFIG_STACKTRACE. To augment reports with last allocation and freeing stack of the physical page, it is recommended to enable also CONFIG_PAGE_OWNER and boot with page_owner=on. -To disable instrumentation for specific files or directories, add a line -similar to the following to the respective kernel Makefile: - -- For a single file (e.g. main.o):: - - KASAN_SANITIZE_main.o := n - -- For all files in one directory:: - - KASAN_SANITIZE := n - Error reports ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @@ -136,22 +131,75 @@ freed (in case of a use-after-free bug report). Next comes a description of the accessed slab object and information about the accessed memory page. In the last section the report shows memory state around the accessed address. -Reading this part requires some understanding of how KASAN works. - -The state of each 8 aligned bytes of memory is encoded in one shadow byte. -Those 8 bytes can be accessible, partially accessible, freed or be a redzone. -We use the following encoding for each shadow byte: 0 means that all 8 bytes -of the corresponding memory region are accessible; number N (1 <= N <= 7) means -that the first N bytes are accessible, and other (8 - N) bytes are not; -any negative value indicates that the entire 8-byte word is inaccessible. -We use different negative values to distinguish between different kinds of -inaccessible memory like redzones or freed memory (see mm/kasan/kasan.h). +Internally KASAN tracks memory state separately for each memory granule, which +is either 8 or 16 aligned bytes depending on KASAN mode. Each number in the +memory state section of the report shows the state of one of the memory +granules that surround the accessed address. + +For generic KASAN the size of each memory granule is 8. The state of each +granule is encoded in one shadow byte. Those 8 bytes can be accessible, +partially accessible, freed or be a part of a redzone. KASAN uses the following +encoding for each shadow byte: 0 means that all 8 bytes of the corresponding +memory region are accessible; number N (1 <= N <= 7) means that the first N +bytes are accessible, and other (8 - N) bytes are not; any negative value +indicates that the entire 8-byte word is inaccessible. KASAN uses different +negative values to distinguish between different kinds of inaccessible memory +like redzones or freed memory (see mm/kasan/kasan.h). In the report above the arrows point to the shadow byte 03, which means that the accessed address is partially accessible. For tag-based KASAN this last report section shows the memory tags around the -accessed address (see Implementation details section). +accessed address (see `Implementation details`_ section). + +Boot parameters +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Hardware tag-based KASAN mode (see the section about different mode below) is +intended for use in production as a security mitigation. Therefore it supports +boot parameters that allow to disable KASAN competely or otherwise control +particular KASAN features. + +The things that can be controlled are: + +1. Whether KASAN is enabled at all. +2. Whether KASAN collects and saves alloc/free stacks. +3. Whether KASAN panics on a detected bug or not. + +The ``kasan.mode`` boot parameter allows to choose one of three main modes: + +- ``kasan.mode=off`` - KASAN is disabled, no tag checks are performed +- ``kasan.mode=prod`` - only essential production features are enabled +- ``kasan.mode=full`` - all KASAN features are enabled + +The chosen mode provides default control values for the features mentioned +above. However it's also possible to override the default values by providing: + +- ``kasan.stacktrace=off`` or ``=on`` - enable alloc/free stack collection + (default: ``on`` for ``mode=full``, + otherwise ``off``) +- ``kasan.fault=report`` or ``=panic`` - only print KASAN report or also panic + (default: ``report``) + +If ``kasan.mode`` parameter is not provided, it defaults to ``full`` when +``CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL`` is enabled, and to ``prod`` otherwise. + +For developers +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Software KASAN modes use compiler instrumentation to insert validity checks. +Such instrumentation might be incompatible with some part of the kernel, and +therefore needs to be disabled. To disable instrumentation for specific files +or directories, add a line similar to the following to the respective kernel +Makefile: + +- For a single file (e.g. main.o):: + + KASAN_SANITIZE_main.o := n + +- For all files in one directory:: + + KASAN_SANITIZE := n Implementation details @@ -160,10 +208,10 @@ Implementation details Generic KASAN ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -From a high level, our approach to memory error detection is similar to that -of kmemcheck: use shadow memory to record whether each byte of memory is safe -to access, and use compile-time instrumentation to insert checks of shadow -memory on each memory access. +From a high level perspective, KASAN's approach to memory error detection is +similar to that of kmemcheck: use shadow memory to record whether each byte of +memory is safe to access, and use compile-time instrumentation to insert checks +of shadow memory on each memory access. Generic KASAN dedicates 1/8th of kernel memory to its shadow memory (e.g. 16TB to cover 128TB on x86_64) and uses direct mapping with a scale and offset to @@ -190,23 +238,34 @@ function calls GCC directly inserts the code to check the shadow memory. This option significantly enlarges kernel but it gives x1.1-x2 performance boost over outline instrumented kernel. -Generic KASAN prints up to 2 call_rcu() call stacks in reports, the last one -and the second to last. +Generic KASAN also reports the last 2 call stacks to creation of work that +potentially has access to an object. Call stacks for the following are shown: +call_rcu() and workqueue queuing. + +Generic KASAN is the only mode that delays the reuse of freed object via +quarantine (see mm/kasan/quarantine.c for implementation). Software tag-based KASAN ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -Tag-based KASAN uses the Top Byte Ignore (TBI) feature of modern arm64 CPUs to -store a pointer tag in the top byte of kernel pointers. Like generic KASAN it -uses shadow memory to store memory tags associated with each 16-byte memory +Software tag-based KASAN requires software memory tagging support in the form +of HWASan-like compiler instrumentation (see HWASan documentation for details). + +Software tag-based KASAN is currently only implemented for arm64 architecture. + +Software tag-based KASAN uses the Top Byte Ignore (TBI) feature of arm64 CPUs +to store a pointer tag in the top byte of kernel pointers. Like generic KASAN +it uses shadow memory to store memory tags associated with each 16-byte memory cell (therefore it dedicates 1/16th of the kernel memory for shadow memory). -On each memory allocation tag-based KASAN generates a random tag, tags the -allocated memory with this tag, and embeds this tag into the returned pointer. +On each memory allocation software tag-based KASAN generates a random tag, tags +the allocated memory with this tag, and embeds this tag into the returned +pointer. + Software tag-based KASAN uses compile-time instrumentation to insert checks before each memory access. These checks make sure that tag of the memory that is being accessed is equal to tag of the pointer that is used to access this -memory. In case of a tag mismatch tag-based KASAN prints a bug report. +memory. In case of a tag mismatch software tag-based KASAN prints a bug report. Software tag-based KASAN also has two instrumentation modes (outline, that emits callbacks to check memory accesses; and inline, that performs the shadow @@ -215,9 +274,36 @@ simply printed from the function that performs the access check. With inline instrumentation a brk instruction is emitted by the compiler, and a dedicated brk handler is used to print bug reports. -A potential expansion of this mode is a hardware tag-based mode, which would -use hardware memory tagging support instead of compiler instrumentation and -manual shadow memory manipulation. +Software tag-based KASAN uses 0xFF as a match-all pointer tag (accesses through +pointers with 0xFF pointer tag aren't checked). The value 0xFE is currently +reserved to tag freed memory regions. + +Software tag-based KASAN currently only supports tagging of +kmem_cache_alloc/kmalloc and page_alloc memory. + +Hardware tag-based KASAN +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Hardware tag-based KASAN is similar to the software mode in concept, but uses +hardware memory tagging support instead of compiler instrumentation and +shadow memory. + +Hardware tag-based KASAN is currently only implemented for arm64 architecture +and based on both arm64 Memory Tagging Extension (MTE) introduced in ARMv8.5 +Instruction Set Architecture, and Top Byte Ignore (TBI). + +Special arm64 instructions are used to assign memory tags for each allocation. +Same tags are assigned to pointers to those allocations. On every memory +access, hardware makes sure that tag of the memory that is being accessed is +equal to tag of the pointer that is used to access this memory. In case of a +tag mismatch a fault is generated and a report is printed. + +Hardware tag-based KASAN uses 0xFF as a match-all pointer tag (accesses through +pointers with 0xFF pointer tag aren't checked). The value 0xFE is currently +reserved to tag freed memory regions. + +Hardware tag-based KASAN currently only supports tagging of +kmem_cache_alloc/kmalloc and page_alloc memory. What memory accesses are sanitised by KASAN? -------------------------------------------- @@ -264,17 +350,17 @@ Most mappings in vmalloc space are small, requiring less than a full page of shadow space. Allocating a full shadow page per mapping would therefore be wasteful. Furthermore, to ensure that different mappings use different shadow pages, mappings would have to be aligned to -``KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE * PAGE_SIZE``. +``KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE * PAGE_SIZE``. -Instead, we share backing space across multiple mappings. We allocate +Instead, KASAN shares backing space across multiple mappings. It allocates a backing page when a mapping in vmalloc space uses a particular page of the shadow region. This page can be shared by other vmalloc mappings later on. -We hook in to the vmap infrastructure to lazily clean up unused shadow +KASAN hooks into the vmap infrastructure to lazily clean up unused shadow memory. -To avoid the difficulties around swapping mappings around, we expect +To avoid the difficulties around swapping mappings around, KASAN expects that the part of the shadow region that covers the vmalloc space will not be covered by the early shadow page, but will be left unmapped. This will require changes in arch-specific code. @@ -285,24 +371,31 @@ architectures that do not have a fixed module region. CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST & CONFIG_TEST_KASAN_MODULE -------------------------------------------------- -``CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST`` utilizes the KUnit Test Framework for testing. -This means each test focuses on a small unit of functionality and -there are a few ways these tests can be run. +KASAN tests consist on two parts: + +1. Tests that are integrated with the KUnit Test Framework. Enabled with +``CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST``. These tests can be run and partially verified +automatically in a few different ways, see the instructions below. -Each test will print the KASAN report if an error is detected and then -print the number of the test and the status of the test: +2. Tests that are currently incompatible with KUnit. Enabled with +``CONFIG_TEST_KASAN_MODULE`` and can only be run as a module. These tests can +only be verified manually, by loading the kernel module and inspecting the +kernel log for KASAN reports. -pass:: +Each KUnit-compatible KASAN test prints a KASAN report if an error is detected. +Then the test prints its number and status. + +When a test passes:: ok 28 - kmalloc_double_kzfree -or, if kmalloc failed:: +When a test fails due to a failed ``kmalloc``:: # kmalloc_large_oob_right: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:163 Expected ptr is not null, but is not ok 4 - kmalloc_large_oob_right -or, if a KASAN report was expected, but not found:: +When a test fails due to a missing KASAN report:: # kmalloc_double_kzfree: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:629 Expected kasan_data->report_expected == kasan_data->report_found, but @@ -310,46 +403,38 @@ or, if a KASAN report was expected, but not found:: kasan_data->report_found == 0 not ok 28 - kmalloc_double_kzfree -All test statuses are tracked as they run and an overall status will -be printed at the end:: +At the end the cumulative status of all KASAN tests is printed. On success:: ok 1 - kasan -or:: +Or, if one of the tests failed:: not ok 1 - kasan -(1) Loadable Module -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +There are a few ways to run KUnit-compatible KASAN tests. + +1. Loadable module +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ With ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` enabled, ``CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST`` can be built as -a loadable module and run on any architecture that supports KASAN -using something like insmod or modprobe. The module is called ``test_kasan``. +a loadable module and run on any architecture that supports KASAN by loading +the module with insmod or modprobe. The module is called ``test_kasan``. -(2) Built-In -~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +2. Built-In +~~~~~~~~~~~ With ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` built-in, ``CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST`` can be built-in -on any architecure that supports KASAN. These and any other KUnit -tests enabled will run and print the results at boot as a late-init -call. +on any architecure that supports KASAN. These and any other KUnit tests enabled +will run and print the results at boot as a late-init call. -(3) Using kunit_tool -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +3. Using kunit_tool +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -With ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` and ``CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST`` built-in, we can also -use kunit_tool to see the results of these along with other KUnit -tests in a more readable way. This will not print the KASAN reports -of tests that passed. Use `KUnit documentation <https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/index.html>`_ for more up-to-date -information on kunit_tool. +With ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` and ``CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST`` built-in, it's also +possible use ``kunit_tool`` to see the results of these and other KUnit tests +in a more readable way. This will not print the KASAN reports of the tests that +passed. Use `KUnit documentation <https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/index.html>`_ +for more up-to-date information on ``kunit_tool``. .. _KUnit: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/index.html - -``CONFIG_TEST_KASAN_MODULE`` is a set of KASAN tests that could not be -converted to KUnit. These tests can be run only as a module with -``CONFIG_TEST_KASAN_MODULE`` built as a loadable module and -``CONFIG_KASAN`` built-in. The type of error expected and the -function being run is printed before the expression expected to give -an error. Then the error is printed, if found, and that test -should be interpretted to pass only if the error was the one expected -by the test. diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst index 8548b0b04e43..d2c4c27e1702 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ handles as they don't belong to a particular subsystem. The bytes 4-7 are currently reserved and must be zero. In the future the number of bytes used for the subsystem or handle ids might be increased. -When a particular userspace proccess collects coverage via a common +When a particular userspace process collects coverage via a common handle, kcov will collect coverage for each code section that is annotated to use the common handle obtained as kcov_handle from the current task_struct. However non common handles allow to collect coverage diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kgdb.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kgdb.rst index 77b688e6a254..43456244651a 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kgdb.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kgdb.rst @@ -63,10 +63,9 @@ will want to turn on ``CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO`` which is called It is advised, but not required, that you turn on the ``CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER`` kernel option which is called :menuselection:`Compile the kernel with frame pointers` in the config menu. This option inserts code -to into the compiled executable which saves the frame information in -registers or on the stack at different points which allows a debugger -such as gdb to more accurately construct stack back traces while -debugging the kernel. +into the compiled executable which saves the frame information in registers +or on the stack at different points which allows a debugger such as gdb to +more accurately construct stack back traces while debugging the kernel. If the architecture that you are using supports the kernel option ``CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX``, you should consider turning it off. This diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst index 1628862e7024..8d5029ad210a 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ things to try. re-run kunit_tool. 5. Try to run ``make ARCH=um defconfig`` before running ``kunit.py run``. This may help clean up any residual config items which could be causing problems. -6. Finally, try running KUnit outside UML. KUnit and KUnit tests can run be +6. Finally, try running KUnit outside UML. KUnit and KUnit tests can be built into any kernel, or can be built as a module and loaded at runtime. Doing so should allow you to determine if UML is causing the issue you're seeing. When tests are built-in, they will execute when the kernel boots, and diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst index da1d6f0ed6bc..8dbcdc552606 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst @@ -175,17 +175,17 @@ An example Kconfig entry: .. code-block:: none - config FOO_KUNIT_TEST - tristate "KUnit test for foo" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS - depends on KUNIT - default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS - help - This builds unit tests for foo. + config FOO_KUNIT_TEST + tristate "KUnit test for foo" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on KUNIT + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + This builds unit tests for foo. - For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer - to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. - If unsure, say N + If unsure, say N. Test File and Module Names diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst index 62142a47488c..d9fdc14f0677 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ project, see :doc:`start`. Organization of this document ============================= -This document is organized into two main sections: Testing and Isolating -Behavior. The first covers what unit tests are and how to use KUnit to write -them. The second covers how to use KUnit to isolate code and make it possible -to unit test code that was otherwise un-unit-testable. +This document is organized into two main sections: Testing and Common Patterns. +The first covers what unit tests are and how to use KUnit to write them. The +second covers common testing patterns, e.g. how to isolate code and make it +possible to unit test code that was otherwise un-unit-testable. Testing ======= @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ behavior of a function called ``add``; the first parameter is always of type the second parameter, in this case, is what the value is expected to be; the last value is what the value actually is. If ``add`` passes all of these expectations, the test case, ``add_test_basic`` will pass; if any one of these -expectations fail, the test case will fail. +expectations fails, the test case will fail. It is important to understand that a test case *fails* when any expectation is violated; however, the test will continue running, potentially trying other @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ Example: kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite); In the above example the test suite, ``example_test_suite``, would run the test -cases ``example_test_foo``, ``example_test_bar``, and ``example_test_baz``, +cases ``example_test_foo``, ``example_test_bar``, and ``example_test_baz``; each would have ``example_test_init`` called immediately before it and would have ``example_test_exit`` called immediately after it. ``kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite)`` registers the test suite with the @@ -218,8 +218,11 @@ test was built in or not). For more information on these types of things see the :doc:`api/test`. +Common Patterns +=============== + Isolating Behavior -================== +------------------ The most important aspect of unit testing that other forms of testing do not provide is the ability to limit the amount of code under test to a single unit. @@ -229,11 +232,11 @@ through some sort of indirection where a function is exposed as part of an API such that the definition of that function can be changed without affecting the rest of the code base. In the kernel this primarily comes from two constructs, classes, structs that contain function pointers that are provided by the -implementer, and architecture specific functions which have definitions selected +implementer, and architecture-specific functions which have definitions selected at compile time. Classes -------- +~~~~~~~ Classes are not a construct that is built into the C programming language; however, it is an easily derived concept. Accordingly, pretty much every project @@ -451,6 +454,74 @@ We can now use it to test ``struct eeprom_buffer``: destroy_eeprom_buffer(ctx->eeprom_buffer); } +Testing against multiple inputs +------------------------------- + +Testing just a few inputs might not be enough to have confidence that the code +works correctly, e.g. for a hash function. + +In such cases, it can be helpful to have a helper macro or function, e.g. this +fictitious example for ``sha1sum(1)`` + +.. code-block:: c + + /* Note: the cast is to satisfy overly strict type-checking. */ + #define TEST_SHA1(in, want) \ + sha1sum(in, out); \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, want, "sha1sum(%s)", in); + + char out[40]; + TEST_SHA1("hello world", "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed"); + TEST_SHA1("hello world!", "430ce34d020724ed75a196dfc2ad67c77772d169"); + + +Note the use of ``KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG`` to give more context when it fails +and make it easier to track down. (Yes, in this example, ``want`` is likely +going to be unique enough on its own). + +The ``_MSG`` variants are even more useful when the same expectation is called +multiple times (in a loop or helper function) and thus the line number isn't +enough to identify what failed, like below. + +In some cases, it can be helpful to write a *table-driven test* instead, e.g. + +.. code-block:: c + + int i; + char out[40]; + + struct sha1_test_case { + const char *str; + const char *sha1; + }; + + struct sha1_test_case cases[] = { + { + .str = "hello world", + .sha1 = "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed", + }, + { + .str = "hello world!", + .sha1 = "430ce34d020724ed75a196dfc2ad67c77772d169", + }, + }; + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cases); ++i) { + sha1sum(cases[i].str, out); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, cases[i].sha1, + "sha1sum(%s)", cases[i].str); + } + + +There's more boilerplate involved, but it can: + +* be more readable when there are multiple inputs/outputs thanks to field names, + + * E.g. see ``fs/ext4/inode-test.c`` for an example of both. +* reduce duplication if test cases can be shared across multiple tests. + + * E.g. if we wanted to also test ``sha256sum``, we could add a ``sha256`` + field and reuse ``cases``. + .. _kunit-on-non-uml: KUnit on non-UML architectures @@ -459,7 +530,7 @@ KUnit on non-UML architectures By default KUnit uses UML as a way to provide dependencies for code under test. Under most circumstances KUnit's usage of UML should be treated as an implementation detail of how KUnit works under the hood. Nevertheless, there -are instances where being able to run architecture specific code or test +are instances where being able to run architecture-specific code or test against real hardware is desirable. For these reasons KUnit supports running on other architectures. @@ -599,7 +670,7 @@ writing normal KUnit tests. One special caveat is that you have to reset hardware state in between test cases; if this is not possible, you may only be able to run one test case per invocation. -.. TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Add an actual example of an architecture +.. TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Add an actual example of an architecture- dependent KUnit test. KUnit debugfs representation diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/ubsan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/ubsan.rst index 655e6b63c227..1be6618e232d 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/ubsan.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/ubsan.rst @@ -86,3 +86,4 @@ References .. _1: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.0/gcc/Debugging-Options.html .. _2: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Debugging-Options.html +.. _3: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer.html |