diff options
author | Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> | 2009-09-22 09:30:38 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-09-22 12:37:44 +0400 |
commit | 0729e196147692d84d4c099fcff056eba2ed61d8 (patch) | |
tree | 5374dc5cd1cb2cfb3da1174b67ed07685592e83a /CREDITS | |
parent | d8d88fbb186fe3ea37b2a58adb32413c98b59656 (diff) | |
download | linux-0729e196147692d84d4c099fcff056eba2ed61d8.tar.xz |
futex: Fix wakeup race by setting TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before queue_me()
PI futexes do not use the same plist_node_empty() test for wakeup.
It was possible for the waiter (in futex_wait_requeue_pi()) to set
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE after the waker assigned the rtmutex to the
waiter. The waiter would then note the plist was not empty and call
schedule(). The task would not be found by any subsequeuent futex
wakeups, resulting in a userspace hang.
By moving the setting of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to before the call to
queue_me(), the race with the waker is eliminated. Since we no
longer call get_user() from within queue_me(), there is no need to
delay the setting of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE until after the call to
queue_me().
The FUTEX_LOCK_PI operation is not affected as futex_lock_pi()
relies entirely on the rtmutex code to handle schedule() and
wakeup. The requeue PI code is affected because the waiter starts
as a non-PI waiter and is woken on a PI futex.
Remove the crusty old comment about holding spinlocks() across
get_user() as we no longer do that. Correct the locking statement
with a description of why the test is performed.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <20090922053038.8717.97838.stgit@Aeon>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'CREDITS')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions