BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/kernel/sched, branch v4.17.16

sched/smt: Update sched_smt_present at runtime

2018-08-15T16:11:00+00:00

commit ba2591a5993eabcc8e874e30f361d8ffbb10d6d4 upstream The static key sched_smt_present is only updated at boot time when SMT siblings have been detected. Booting with maxcpus=1 and bringing the siblings online after boot rebuilds the scheduling domains correctly but does not update the static key, so the SMT code is not enabled. Let the key be updated in the scheduler CPU hotplug code to fix this. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/deadline: Update rq_clock of later_rq when pushing a task

2018-08-15T16:10:57+00:00

commit 840d719604b0925ca23dde95f1767e4528668369 upstream. Daniel Casini got this warn while running a DL task here at RetisLab: [ 461.137582] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 461.137583] rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP [ 461.137599] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2354 at kernel/sched/sched.h:967 assert_clock_updated.isra.32.part.33+0x17/0x20 [a ton of modules] [ 461.137646] CPU: 4 PID: 2354 Comm: label_image Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #3 [ 461.137647] Hardware name: ASUS All Series/Z87-K, BIOS 0801 09/02/2013 [ 461.137649] RIP: 0010:assert_clock_updated.isra.32.part.33+0x17/0x20 [ 461.137649] Code: ff 48 89 83 08 09 00 00 eb c6 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 c7 c7 98 7a 6c a5 c6 05 bc 0d 54 01 01 48 89 e5 e8 a9 84 fb ff <0f> 0b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 7e 60 01 74 0a 48 3b [ 461.137673] RSP: 0018:ffffa77e08cafc68 EFLAGS: 00010082 [ 461.137674] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8b3fc1702d80 RCX: 0000000000000006 [ 461.137674] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000096 RDI: ffff8b3fded164b0 [ 461.137675] RBP: ffffa77e08cafc68 R08: 0000000000000026 R09: 0000000000000339 [ 461.137676] R10: ffff8b3fd060d410 R11: 0000000000000026 R12: ffffffffa4e14e20 [ 461.137677] R13: ffff8b3fdec22940 R14: ffff8b3fc1702da0 R15: ffff8b3fdec22940 [ 461.137678] FS: 00007efe43ee5700(0000) GS:ffff8b3fded00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 461.137679] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 461.137680] CR2: 00007efe30000010 CR3: 0000000301744003 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 461.137680] Call Trace: [ 461.137684] push_dl_task.part.46+0x3bc/0x460 [ 461.137686] task_woken_dl+0x60/0x80 [ 461.137689] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x4f/0x150 [ 461.137690] ttwu_do_activate+0x77/0x80 [ 461.137692] try_to_wake_up+0x1d6/0x4c0 [ 461.137693] wake_up_q+0x32/0x70 [ 461.137696] do_futex+0x7e7/0xb50 [ 461.137698] __x64_sys_futex+0x8b/0x180 [ 461.137701] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 461.137703] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 461.137705] RIP: 0033:0x7efe4918ca26 [ 461.137705] Code: 00 00 00 74 17 49 8b 48 20 44 8b 59 10 41 83 e3 30 41 83 fb 20 74 1e be 85 00 00 00 41 ba 01 00 00 00 41 b9 01 00 00 04 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 1f 31 c0 c3 be 8c 00 00 00 49 89 c8 4d 31 d2 [ 461.137738] RSP: 002b:00007efe43ee4928 EFLAGS: 00000283 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca [ 461.137739] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000005094df0 RCX: 00007efe4918ca26 [ 461.137740] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000085 RDI: 0000000005094e24 [ 461.137741] RBP: 00007efe43ee49c0 R08: 0000000005094e20 R09: 0000000004000001 [ 461.137741] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000283 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 461.137742] R13: 0000000005094df8 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000448a10 [ 461.137743] ---[ end trace 187df4cad2bf7649 ]--- This warning happened in the push_dl_task(), because __add_running_bw()->cpufreq_update_util() is getting the rq_clock of the later_rq before its update, which takes place at activate_task(). The fix then is to update the rq_clock before calling add_running_bw(). To avoid double rq_clock_update() call, we set ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK flag to activate_task(). Reported-by: Daniel Casini Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Juri Lelli Cc: Clark Williams Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Luca Abeni Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta Fixes: e0367b12674b sched/deadline: Move CPU frequency selection triggering points Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ca31d073a4788acf0684a8b255f14fea775ccf20.1532077269.git.bristot@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/cpufreq: Modify aggregate utilization to always include blocked FAIR utilization

2018-08-03T05:47:45+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8ecf04e11283a28ca88b8b8049ac93c3a99fcd2c ] Since the refactoring introduced by: commit 8f111bc357aa ("cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support") we aggregate FAIR utilization only if this class has runnable tasks. This was mainly due to avoid the risk to stay on an high frequency just because of the blocked utilization of a CPU not being properly decayed while the CPU was idle. However, since: commit 31e77c93e432 ("sched/fair: Update blocked load when newly idle") the FAIR blocked utilization is properly decayed also for IDLE CPUs. This allows us to use the FAIR blocked utilization as a safe mechanism to gracefully reduce the frequency only if no FAIR tasks show up on a CPU for a reasonable period of time. Moreover, we also reduce the frequency drops of CPUs running periodic tasks which, depending on the task periodicity and the time required for a frequency switch, was increasing the chances to introduce some undesirable performance variations. Reported-by: Vincent Guittot Tested-by: Vincent Guittot Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Acked-by: Vincent Guittot Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Joel Fernandes Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Morten Rasmussen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki Cc: Steve Muckle Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180524141023.13765-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/headers: Fix typo

2018-05-31T10:27:13+00:00

I cannot spell 'throttling'. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180530224940.17839-1-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

sched/deadline: Fix missing clock update

2018-05-31T10:27:13+00:00

A missing clock update is causing the following warning: rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/sched.h:963 inactive_task_timer+0x5d6/0x720 Call Trace: __hrtimer_run_queues+0x10f/0x530 hrtimer_interrupt+0xe5/0x240 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x2b0 apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 do_idle+0x203/0x280 cpu_startup_entry+0x6f/0x80 start_secondary+0x1b0/0x200 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 hardirqs last enabled at (793919): [] cpuidle_enter_state+0x9e/0x360 hardirqs last disabled at (793920): [] interrupt_entry+0xce/0xe0 softirqs last enabled at (793922): [] irq_enter+0x68/0x70 softirqs last disabled at (793921): [] irq_enter+0x4d/0x70 This happens because inactive_task_timer() calls sub_running_bw() (if TASK_DEAD and non_contending) that might trigger a schedutil update, which might access the clock. Clock is however currently updated only later in inactive_task_timer() function. Fix the problem by updating the clock right after task_rq_lock(). Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Claudio Scordino Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Luca Abeni Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180530160809.9074-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

sched/core: Require cpu_active() in select_task_rq(), for user tasks

2018-05-31T10:24:25+00:00

select_task_rq() is used in a few paths to select the CPU upon which a thread should be run - for example it is used by try_to_wake_up() & by fork or exec balancing. As-is it allows use of any online CPU that is present in the task's cpus_allowed mask. This presents a problem because there is a period whilst CPUs are brought online where a CPU is marked online, but is not yet fully initialized - ie. the period where CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE <= state < CPUHP_ONLINE. Usually we don't run any user tasks during this window, but there are corner cases where this can happen. An example observed is: - Some user task A, running on CPU X, forks to create task B. - sched_fork() calls __set_task_cpu() with cpu=X, setting task B's task_struct::cpu field to X. - CPU X is offlined. - Task A, currently somewhere between the __set_task_cpu() in copy_process() and the call to wake_up_new_task(), is migrated to CPU Y by migrate_tasks() when CPU X is offlined. - CPU X is onlined, but still in the CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE state. The scheduler is now active on CPU X, but there are no user tasks on the runqueue. - Task A runs on CPU Y & reaches wake_up_new_task(). This calls select_task_rq() with cpu=X, taken from task B's task_struct, and select_task_rq() allows CPU X to be returned. - Task A enqueues task B on CPU X's runqueue, via activate_task() & enqueue_task(). - CPU X now has a user task on its runqueue before it has reached the CPUHP_ONLINE state. In most cases, the user tasks that schedule on the newly onlined CPU have no idea that anything went wrong, but one case observed to be problematic is if the task goes on to invoke the sched_setaffinity syscall. The newly onlined CPU reaches the CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE state before the CPU that brought it online calls stop_machine_unpark(). This means that for a portion of the window of time between CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE & CPUHP_ONLINE the newly onlined CPU's struct cpu_stopper has its enabled field set to false. If a user thread is executed on the CPU during this window and it invokes sched_setaffinity with a CPU mask that does not include the CPU it's running on, then when __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() calls stop_one_cpu() intending to invoke migration_cpu_stop() and perform the actual migration away from the CPU it will simply return -ENOENT rather than calling migration_cpu_stop(). We then return from the sched_setaffinity syscall back to the user task that is now running on a CPU which it just asked not to run on, and which is not present in its cpus_allowed mask. This patch resolves the problem by having select_task_rq() enforce that user tasks run on CPUs that are active - the same requirement that select_fallback_rq() already enforces. This should ensure that newly onlined CPUs reach the CPUHP_AP_ACTIVE state before being able to schedule user tasks, and also implies that bringup_wait_for_ap() will have called stop_machine_unpark() which resolves the sched_setaffinity issue above. I haven't yet investigated them, but it may be of interest to review whether any of the actions performed by hotplug states between CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE & CPUHP_AP_ACTIVE could have similar unintended effects on user tasks that might schedule before they are reached, which might widen the scope of the problem from just affecting the behaviour of sched_setaffinity. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180526154648.11635-2-paul.burton@mips.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

sched/core: Fix rules for running on online && !active CPUs

2018-05-31T10:24:24+00:00

As already enforced by the WARN() in __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(), the rules for running on an online && !active CPU are stricter than just being a kthread, you need to be a per-cpu kthread. If you're not strictly per-CPU, you have better CPUs to run on and don't need the partially booted one to get your work done. The exception is to allow smpboot threads to bootstrap the CPU itself and get kernel 'services' initialized before we allow userspace on it. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: 955dbdf4ce87 ("sched: Allow migrating kthreads into online but inactive CPUs") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170725165821.cejhb7v2s3kecems@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

sched/topology: Clarify root domain(s) debug string

2018-05-25T06:03:38+00:00

When scheduler debug is enabled, building scheduling domains outputs information about how the domains are laid out and to which root domain each CPU (or sets of CPUs) belongs, e.g.: CPU0 attaching sched-domain(s): domain-0: span=0-5 level=MC groups: 0:{ span=0 }, 1:{ span=1 }, 2:{ span=2 }, 3:{ span=3 }, 4:{ span=4 }, 5:{ span=5 } CPU1 attaching sched-domain(s): domain-0: span=0-5 level=MC groups: 1:{ span=1 }, 2:{ span=2 }, 3:{ span=3 }, 4:{ span=4 }, 5:{ span=5 }, 0:{ span=0 } [...] span: 0-5 (max cpu_capacity = 1024) The fact that latest line refers to CPUs 0-5 root domain doesn't however look immediately obvious to me: one might wonder why span 0-5 is reported "again". Make it more clear by adding "root domain" to it, as to end with the following: CPU0 attaching sched-domain(s): domain-0: span=0-5 level=MC groups: 0:{ span=0 }, 1:{ span=1 }, 2:{ span=2 }, 3:{ span=3 }, 4:{ span=4 }, 5:{ span=5 } CPU1 attaching sched-domain(s): domain-0: span=0-5 level=MC groups: 1:{ span=1 }, 2:{ span=2 }, 3:{ span=3 }, 4:{ span=4 }, 5:{ span=5 }, 0:{ span=0 } [...] root domain span: 0-5 (max cpu_capacity = 1024) Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Patrick Bellasi Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180524152936.17611-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

sched/deadline: Make the grub_reclaim() function static

2018-05-18T07:05:22+00:00

Since the grub_reclaim() function can be made static, make it so. Silences the following GCC warning (W=1): kernel/sched/deadline.c:1120:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘grub_reclaim’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180516200902.959-1-malat@debian.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

sched/debug: Move the print_rt_rq() and print_dl_rq() declarations to kernel/sched/sched.h

2018-05-18T07:05:14+00:00

In the following commit: 6b55c9654fcc ("sched/debug: Move print_cfs_rq() declaration to kernel/sched/sched.h") the print_cfs_rq() prototype was added to , right next to the prototypes for print_cfs_stats(), print_rt_stats() and print_dl_stats(). Finish this previous commit and also move related prototypes for print_rt_rq() and print_dl_rq(). Remove existing extern declarations now that they not needed anymore. Silences the following GCC warning, triggered by W=1: kernel/sched/debug.c:573:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘print_rt_rq’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] kernel/sched/debug.c:603:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘print_dl_rq’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180516195348.30426-1-malat@debian.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar