BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/kernel/bpf, branch v4.17.13

bpf: fix references to free_bpf_prog_info() in comments

2018-08-03T05:47:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit ab7f5bf0928be2f148d000a6eaa6c0a36e74750e ] Comments in the verifier refer to free_bpf_prog_info() which seems to have never existed in tree. Replace it with free_used_maps(). Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: fix multi-function JITed dump obtained via syscall

2018-08-03T05:47:46+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4d56a76ead2fcd856e677cdc9445ad331a409b8c ] Currently, for multi-function programs, we cannot get the JITed instructions using the bpf system call's BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD command. Because of this, userspace tools such as bpftool fail to identify a multi-function program as being JITed or not. With the JIT enabled and the test program running, this can be verified as follows: # cat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable 1 Before applying this patch: # bpftool prog list 1: kprobe name foo tag b811aab41a39ad3d gpl loaded_at 2018-05-16T11:43:38+0530 uid 0 xlated 216B not jited memlock 65536B ... # bpftool prog dump jited id 1 no instructions returned After applying this patch: # bpftool prog list 1: kprobe name foo tag b811aab41a39ad3d gpl loaded_at 2018-05-16T12:13:01+0530 uid 0 xlated 216B jited 308B memlock 65536B ... # bpftool prog dump jited id 1 0: nop 4: nop 8: mflr r0 c: std r0,16(r1) 10: stdu r1,-112(r1) 14: std r31,104(r1) 18: addi r31,r1,48 1c: li r3,10 ... Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: undo prog rejection on read-only lock failure

2018-07-22T13:16:09+00:00

commit 85782e037f8aba8922dadb24a1523ca0b82ab8bc upstream. Partially undo commit 9facc336876f ("bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only lock") since it caused a regression, that is, syzkaller was able to manage to cause a panic via fault injection deep in set_memory_ro() path by letting an allocation fail: In x86's __change_page_attr_set_clr() it was able to change the attributes of the primary mapping but not in the alias mapping via cpa_process_alias(), so the second, inner call to the __change_page_attr() via __change_page_attr_set_clr() had to split a larger page and failed in the alloc_pages() with the artifically triggered allocation error which is then propagated down to the call site. Thus, for set_memory_ro() this means that it returned with an error, but from debugging a probe_kernel_write() revealed EFAULT on that memory since the primary mapping succeeded to get changed. Therefore the subsequent hdr->locked = 0 reset triggered the panic as it was performed on read-only memory, so call-site assumptions were infact wrong to assume that it would either succeed /or/ not succeed at all since there's no such rollback in set_memory_*() calls from partial change of mappings, in other words, we're left in a state that is "half done". A later undo via set_memory_rw() is succeeding though due to matching permissions on that part (aka due to the try_preserve_large_page() succeeding). While reproducing locally with explicitly triggering this error, the initial splitting only happens on rare occasions and in real world it would additionally need oom conditions, but that said, it could partially fail. Therefore, it is definitely wrong to bail out on set_memory_ro() error and reject the program with the set_memory_*() semantics we have today. Shouldn't have gone the extra mile since no other user in tree today infact checks for any set_memory_*() errors, e.g. neither module_enable_ro() / module_disable_ro() for module RO/NX handling which is mostly default these days nor kprobes core with alloc_insn_page() / free_insn_page() as examples that could be invoked long after bootup and original 314beb9bcabf ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks") did neither when it got first introduced to BPF so "improving" with bailing out was clearly not right when set_memory_*() cannot handle it today. Kees suggested that if set_memory_*() can fail, we should annotate it with __must_check, and all callers need to deal with it gracefully given those set_memory_*() markings aren't "advisory", but they're expected to actually do what they say. This might be an option worth to move forward in future but would at the same time require that set_memory_*() calls from supporting archs are guaranteed to be "atomic" in that they provide rollback if part of the range fails, once that happened, the transition from RW -> RO could be made more robust that way, while subsequent RO -> RW transition /must/ continue guaranteeing to always succeed the undo part. Reported-by: syzbot+a4eb8c7766952a1ca872@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+d866d1925855328eac3b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 9facc336876f ("bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only lock") Cc: Laura Abbott Cc: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: don't leave partial mangled prog in jit_subprogs error path

2018-07-22T13:16:07+00:00

commit c7a897843224a92209f306c984975b704969b89d upstream. syzkaller managed to trigger the following bug through fault injection: [...] [ 141.043668] verifier bug. No program starts at insn 3 [ 141.044648] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4072 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1613 get_callee_stack_depth kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1612 [inline] [ 141.044648] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4072 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1613 fixup_call_args kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5587 [inline] [ 141.044648] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4072 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1613 bpf_check+0x525e/0x5e60 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5952 [ 141.047355] CPU: 3 PID: 4072 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #51 [ 141.048446] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 [ 141.049877] Call Trace: [ 141.050324] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] [ 141.050324] dump_stack+0x1c9/0x2b4 lib/dump_stack.c:113 [ 141.050950] ? dump_stack_print_info.cold.2+0x52/0x52 lib/dump_stack.c:60 [ 141.051837] panic+0x238/0x4e7 kernel/panic.c:184 [ 141.052386] ? add_taint.cold.5+0x16/0x16 kernel/panic.c:385 [ 141.053101] ? __warn.cold.8+0x148/0x1ba kernel/panic.c:537 [ 141.053814] ? __warn.cold.8+0x117/0x1ba kernel/panic.c:530 [ 141.054506] ? get_callee_stack_depth kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1612 [inline] [ 141.054506] ? fixup_call_args kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5587 [inline] [ 141.054506] ? bpf_check+0x525e/0x5e60 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5952 [ 141.055163] __warn.cold.8+0x163/0x1ba kernel/panic.c:538 [ 141.055820] ? get_callee_stack_depth kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1612 [inline] [ 141.055820] ? fixup_call_args kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5587 [inline] [ 141.055820] ? bpf_check+0x525e/0x5e60 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5952 [...] What happens in jit_subprogs() is that kcalloc() for the subprog func buffer is failing with NULL where we then bail out. Latter is a plain return -ENOMEM, and this is definitely not okay since earlier in the loop we are walking all subprogs and temporarily rewrite insn->off to remember the subprog id as well as insn->imm to temporarily point the call to __bpf_call_base + 1 for the initial JIT pass. Thus, bailing out in such state and handing this over to the interpreter is troublesome since later/subsequent e.g. find_subprog() lookups are based on wrong insn->imm. Therefore, once we hit this point, we need to jump to out_free path where we undo all changes from earlier loop, so that interpreter can work on unmodified insn->{off,imm}. Another point is that should find_subprog() fail in jit_subprogs() due to a verifier bug, then we also should not simply defer the program to the interpreter since also here we did partial modifications. Instead we should just bail out entirely and return an error to the user who is trying to load the program. Fixes: 1c2a088a6626 ("bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs") Reported-by: syzbot+7d427828b2ea6e592804@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: sockmap, consume_skb in close path

2018-07-22T13:16:07+00:00

commit 7ebc14d507b4b55105da8d1a1eda323381529cc7 upstream. Currently, when a sock is closed and the bpf_tcp_close() callback is used we remove memory but do not free the skb. Call consume_skb() if the skb is attached to the buffer. Reported-by: syzbot+d464d2c20c717ef5a6a8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 1aa12bdf1bfb ("bpf: sockmap, add sock close() hook to remove socks") Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: sockmap, fix crash when ipv6 sock is added

2018-07-22T13:16:06+00:00

commit 9901c5d77e969d8215a8e8d087ef02e6feddc84c upstream. This fixes a crash where we assign tcp_prot to IPv6 sockets instead of tcpv6_prot. Previously we overwrote the sk->prot field with tcp_prot even in the AF_INET6 case. This patch ensures the correct tcp_prot and tcpv6_prot are used. Tested with 'netserver -6' and 'netperf -H [IPv6]' as well as 'netperf -H [IPv4]'. The ESTABLISHED check resolves the previously crashing case here. Fixes: 174a79ff9515 ("bpf: sockmap with sk redirect support") Reported-by: syzbot+5c063698bdbfac19f363@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Wei Wang Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only lock

2018-07-22T13:16:06+00:00

commit 9facc336876f7ecf9edba4c67b90426fde4ec898 upstream. We currently lock any JITed image as read-only via bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro() as well as the BPF image as read-only through bpf_prog_lock_ro(). In the case any of these would fail we throw a WARN_ON_ONCE() in order to yell loudly to the log. Perhaps, to some extend, this may be comparable to an allocation where __GFP_NOWARN is explicitly not set. Added via 65869a47f348 ("bpf: improve read-only handling"), this behavior is slightly different compared to any of the other in-kernel set_memory_ro() users who do not check the return code of set_memory_ro() and friends /at all/ (e.g. in the case of module_enable_ro() / module_disable_ro()). Given in BPF this is mandatory hardening step, we want to know whether there are any issues that would leave both BPF data writable. So it happens that syzkaller enabled fault injection and it triggered memory allocation failure deep inside x86's change_page_attr_set_clr() which was triggered from set_memory_ro(). Now, there are two options: i) leaving everything as is, and ii) reworking the image locking code in order to have a final checkpoint out of the central bpf_prog_select_runtime() which probes whether any of the calls during prog setup weren't successful, and then bailing out with an error. Option ii) is a better approach since this additional paranoia avoids altogether leaving any potential W+X pages from BPF side in the system. Therefore, lets be strict about it, and reject programs in such unlikely occasion. While testing I noticed also that one bpf_prog_lock_ro() call was missing on the outer dummy prog in case of calls, e.g. in the destructor we call bpf_prog_free_deferred() on the main prog where we try to bpf_prog_unlock_free() the program, and since we go via bpf_prog_select_runtime() do that as well. Reported-by: syzbot+3b889862e65a98317058@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+9e762b52dd17e616a7a5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: reject passing modified ctx to helper functions

2018-07-17T09:48:21+00:00

commit 58990d1ff3f7896ee341030e9a7c2e4002570683 upstream. As commit 28e33f9d78ee ("bpf: disallow arithmetic operations on context pointer") already describes, f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") removed the specific white-listed cases we had previously where we would allow for pointer arithmetic in order to further generalize it, and allow e.g. context access via modified registers. While the dereferencing of modified context pointers had been forbidden through 28e33f9d78ee, syzkaller did recently manage to trigger several KASAN splats for slab out of bounds access and use after frees by simply passing a modified context pointer to a helper function which would then do the bad access since verifier allowed it in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(). Rejecting arithmetic on ctx pointer in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() generally could break existing programs as there's a valid use case in tracing in combination with passing the ctx to helpers as bpf_probe_read(), where the register then becomes unknown at verification time due to adding a non-constant offset to it. An access sequence may look like the following: offset = args->filename; /* field __data_loc filename */ bpf_probe_read(&dst, len, (char *)args + offset); // args is ctx There are two options: i) we could special case the ctx and as soon as we add a constant or bounded offset to it (hence ctx type wouldn't change) we could turn the ctx into an unknown scalar, or ii) we generalize the sanity test for ctx member access into a small helper and assert it on the ctx register that was passed as a function argument. Fwiw, latter is more obvious and less complex at the same time, and one case that may potentially be legitimate in future for ctx member access at least would be for ctx to carry a const offset. Therefore, fix follows approach from ii) and adds test cases to BPF kselftests. Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Reported-by: syzbot+3d0b2441dbb71751615e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+c8504affd4fdd0c1b626@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+e5190cb881d8660fb1a3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+efae31b384d5badbd620@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Edward Cree Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net

2018-05-26T02:54:42+00:00

Pull networking fixes from David Miller: "Let's begin the holiday weekend with some networking fixes: 1) Whoops need to restrict cfg80211 wiphy names even more to 64 bytes. From Eric Biggers. 2) Fix flags being ignored when using kernel_connect() with SCTP, from Xin Long. 3) Use after free in DCCP, from Alexey Kodanev. 4) Need to check rhltable_init() return value in ipmr code, from Eric Dumazet. 5) XDP handling fixes in virtio_net from Jason Wang. 6) Missing RTA_TABLE in rtm_ipv4_policy[], from Roopa Prabhu. 7) Need to use IRQ disabling spinlocks in mlx4_qp_lookup(), from Jack Morgenstein. 8) Prevent out-of-bounds speculation using indexes in BPF, from Daniel Borkmann. 9) Fix regression added by AF_PACKET link layer cure, from Willem de Bruijn. 10) Correct ENIC dma mask, from Govindarajulu Varadarajan. 11) Missing config options for PMTU tests, from Stefano Brivio" * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net: (48 commits) ibmvnic: Fix partial success login retries selftests/net: Add missing config options for PMTU tests mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks enic: set DMA mask to 47 bit ppp: remove the PPPIOCDETACH ioctl ipv4: remove warning in ip_recv_error net : sched: cls_api: deal with egdev path only if needed vhost: synchronize IOTLB message with dev cleanup packet: fix reserve calculation net/mlx5: IPSec, Fix a race between concurrent sandbox QP commands net/mlx5e: When RXFCS is set, add FCS data into checksum calculation bpf: properly enforce index mask to prevent out-of-bounds speculation net/mlx4: Fix irq-unsafe spinlock usage net: phy: broadcom: Fix bcm_write_exp() net: phy: broadcom: Fix auxiliary control register reads net: ipv4: add missing RTA_TABLE to rtm_ipv4_policy net/mlx4: fix spelling mistake: "Inrerface" -> "Interface" and rephrase message ibmvnic: Only do H_EOI for mobility events tuntap: correctly set SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE virtio-net: fix leaking page for gso packet during mergeable XDP ...

bpf: properly enforce index mask to prevent out-of-bounds speculation

2018-05-24T15:15:43+00:00

While reviewing the verifier code, I recently noticed that the following two program variants in relation to tail calls can be loaded. Variant 1: # bpftool p d x i 15 0: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3 1: (18) r2 = map[id:5] 3: (05) goto pc+2 4: (18) r2 = map[id:6] 6: (b7) r3 = 7 7: (35) if r3 >= 0xa0 goto pc+2 8: (54) (u32) r3 &= (u32) 255 9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 10: (b7) r0 = 1 11: (95) exit # bpftool m s i 5 5: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 4 memlock 4096B # bpftool m s i 6 6: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 160 memlock 4096B Variant 2: # bpftool p d x i 20 0: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3 1: (18) r2 = map[id:8] 3: (05) goto pc+2 4: (18) r2 = map[id:7] 6: (b7) r3 = 7 7: (35) if r3 >= 0x4 goto pc+2 8: (54) (u32) r3 &= (u32) 3 9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 10: (b7) r0 = 1 11: (95) exit # bpftool m s i 8 8: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 160 memlock 4096B # bpftool m s i 7 7: prog_array flags 0x0 key 4B value 4B max_entries 4 memlock 4096B In both cases the index masking inserted by the verifier in order to control out of bounds speculation from a CPU via b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") seems to be incorrect in what it is enforcing. In the 1st variant, the mask is applied from the map with the significantly larger number of entries where we would allow to a certain degree out of bounds speculation for the smaller map, and in the 2nd variant where the mask is applied from the map with the smaller number of entries, we get buggy behavior since we truncate the index of the larger map. The original intent from commit b2157399cc98 is to reject such occasions where two or more different tail call maps are used in the same tail call helper invocation. However, the check on the BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON is never hit since we never poisoned the saved pointer in the first place! We do this explicitly for map lookups but in case of tail calls we basically used the tail call map in insn_aux_data that was processed in the most recent path which the verifier walked. Thus any prior path that stored a pointer in insn_aux_data at the helper location was always overridden. Fix it by moving the map pointer poison logic into a small helper that covers both BPF helpers with the same logic. After that in fixup_bpf_calls() the poison check is then hit for tail calls and the program rejected. Latter only happens in unprivileged case since this is the *only* occasion where a rewrite needs to happen, and where such rewrite is specific to the map (max_entries, index_mask). In the privileged case the rewrite is generic for the insn->imm / insn->code update so multiple maps from different paths can be handled just fine since all the remaining logic happens in the instruction processing itself. This is similar to the case of map lookups: in case there is a collision of maps in fixup_bpf_calls() we must skip the inlined rewrite since this will turn the generic instruction sequence into a non- generic one. Thus the patch_call_imm will simply update the insn->imm location where the bpf_map_lookup_elem() will later take care of the dispatch. Given we need this 'poison' state as a check, the information of whether a map is an unpriv_array gets lost, so enforcing it prior to that needs an additional state. In general this check is needed since there are some complex and tail call intensive BPF programs out there where LLVM tends to generate such code occasionally. We therefore convert the map_ptr rather into map_state to store all this w/o extra memory overhead, and the bit whether one of the maps involved in the collision was from an unpriv_array thus needs to be retained as well there. Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov