BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/kernel/bpf, branch dev-5.3

bpf: Change size to u64 for bpf_map_{area_alloc, charge_init}()

2019-12-04T21:33:19+00:00

[ Upstream commit ff1c08e1f74b6864854c39be48aa799a6a2e4d2b ] The functions bpf_map_area_alloc() and bpf_map_charge_init() prior this commit passed the size parameter as size_t. In this commit this is changed to u64. All users of these functions avoid size_t overflows on 32-bit systems, by explicitly using u64 when calculating the allocation size and memory charge cost. However, since the result was narrowed by the size_t when passing size and cost to the functions, the overflow handling was in vain. Instead of changing all call sites to size_t and handle overflow at the call site, the parameter is changed to u64 and checked in the functions above. Fixes: d407bd25a204 ("bpf: don't trigger OOM killer under pressure with map alloc") Fixes: c85d69135a91 ("bpf: move memory size checks to bpf_map_charge_init()") Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191029154307.23053-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Allow narrow loads of bpf_sysctl fields with offset > 0

2019-12-04T21:33:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7541c87c9b7a7e07c84481f37f2c19063b44469b ] "ctx:file_pos sysctl:read read ok narrow" works on s390 by accident: it reads the wrong byte, which happens to have the expected value of 0. Improve the test by seeking to the 4th byte and expecting 4 instead of 0. This makes the latent problem apparent: the test attempts to read the first byte of bpf_sysctl.file_pos, assuming this is the least-significant byte, which is not the case on big-endian machines: a non-zero offset is needed. The point of the test is to verify narrow loads, so we cannot cheat our way out by simply using BPF_W. The existence of the test means that such loads have to be supported, most likely because llvm can generate them. Fix the test by adding a big-endian variant, which uses an offset to access the least-significant byte of bpf_sysctl.file_pos. This reveals the final problem: verifier rejects accesses to bpf_sysctl fields with offset > 0. Such accesses are already allowed for a wide range of structs: __sk_buff, bpf_sock_addr and sk_msg_md to name a few. Extend this support to bpf_sysctl by using bpf_ctx_range instead of offsetof when matching field offsets. Fixes: 7b146cebe30c ("bpf: Sysctl hook") Fixes: e1550bfe0de4 ("bpf: Add file_pos field to bpf_sysctl ctx") Fixes: 9a1027e52535 ("selftests/bpf: Test file_pos field in bpf_sysctl ctx") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Andrey Ignatov Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191028122902.9763-1-iii@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix use after free in bpf_get_prog_name

2019-11-12T18:27:46+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3b4d9eb2ee74dd5ea7fa36cffb0ca7f5bc4924da ] There is one more problematic case I noticed while recently fixing BPF kallsyms handling in cd7455f1013e ("bpf: Fix use after free in subprog's jited symbol removal") and that is bpf_get_prog_name(). If BTF has been attached to the prog, then we may be able to fetch the function signature type id in kallsyms through prog->aux->func_info[prog->aux->func_idx].type_id. However, while the BTF object itself is torn down via RCU callback, the prog's aux->func_info is immediately freed via kvfree(prog->aux->func_info) once the prog's refcount either hit zero or when subprograms were already exposed via kallsyms and we hit the error path added in 5482e9a93c83 ("bpf: Fix memleak in aux->func_info and aux->btf"). This violates RCU as well since kallsyms could be walked in parallel where we could access aux->func_info. Hence, defer kvfree() to after RCU grace period. Looking at ba64e7d85252 ("bpf: btf: support proper non-jit func info") there is no reason/dependency where we couldn't defer the kvfree(aux->func_info) into the RCU callback. Fixes: 5482e9a93c83 ("bpf: Fix memleak in aux->func_info and aux->btf") Fixes: ba64e7d85252 ("bpf: btf: support proper non-jit func info") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Yonghong Song Cc: Martin KaFai Lau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/875f2906a7c1a0691f2d567b4d8e4ea2739b1e88.1571779205.git.daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix use after free in subprog's jited symbol removal

2019-11-12T18:27:44+00:00

[ Upstream commit cd7455f1013ef96d5cbf5c05d2b7c06f273810a6 ] syzkaller managed to trigger the following crash: [...] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc90001923030 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD aa551067 P4D aa551067 PUD aa552067 PMD a572b067 PTE 80000000a1173163 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 7982 Comm: syz-executor912 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc3+ #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:bpf_jit_binary_hdr include/linux/filter.h:787 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_get_prog_addr_region kernel/bpf/core.c:531 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_tree_comp kernel/bpf/core.c:600 [inline] RIP: 0010:__lt_find include/linux/rbtree_latch.h:115 [inline] RIP: 0010:latch_tree_find include/linux/rbtree_latch.h:208 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_kallsyms_find kernel/bpf/core.c:674 [inline] RIP: 0010:is_bpf_text_address+0x184/0x3b0 kernel/bpf/core.c:709 [...] Call Trace: kernel_text_address kernel/extable.c:147 [inline] __kernel_text_address+0x9a/0x110 kernel/extable.c:102 unwind_get_return_address+0x4c/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c:19 arch_stack_walk+0x98/0xe0 arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c:26 stack_trace_save+0xb6/0x150 kernel/stacktrace.c:123 save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:69 [inline] set_track mm/kasan/common.c:77 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0x11c/0x1b0 mm/kasan/common.c:510 kasan_slab_alloc+0xf/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:518 slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:584 [inline] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3319 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1f5/0x2e0 mm/slab.c:3483 getname_flags+0xba/0x640 fs/namei.c:138 getname+0x19/0x20 fs/namei.c:209 do_sys_open+0x261/0x560 fs/open.c:1091 __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1115 [inline] __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1110 [inline] __x64_sys_open+0x87/0x90 fs/open.c:1110 do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x1c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [...] After further debugging it turns out that we walk kallsyms while in parallel we tear down a BPF program which contains subprograms that have been JITed though the program itself has not been fully exposed and is eventually bailing out with error. The bpf_prog_kallsyms_del_subprogs() in bpf_prog_load()'s error path removes the symbols, however, bpf_prog_free() tears down the JIT memory too early via scheduled work. Instead, it needs to properly respect RCU grace period as the kallsyms walk for BPF is under RCU. Fix it by refactoring __bpf_prog_put()'s tear down and reuse it in our error path where we defer final destruction when we have subprogs in the program. Fixes: 7d1982b4e335 ("bpf: fix panic in prog load calls cleanup") Fixes: 1c2a088a6626 ("bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs") Reported-by: syzbot+710043c5d1d5b5013bc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Tested-by: syzbot+710043c5d1d5b5013bc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/55f6367324c2d7e9583fa9ccf5385dcbba0d7a6e.1571752452.git.daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: fix precision tracking of stack slots

2019-09-05T12:06:58+00:00

The problem can be seen in the following two tests: 0: (bf) r3 = r10 1: (55) if r3 != 0x7b goto pc+0 2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r3 -8) = 0 3: (79) r4 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8) .. 0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7 1: (bf) r3 = r10 2: (55) if r3 != 0x7b goto pc+0 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r3 -8) = r0 4: (79) r4 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8) When backtracking need to mark R4 it will mark slot fp-8. But ST or STX into fp-8 could belong to the same block of instructions. When backtracing is done the parent state may have fp-8 slot as "unallocated stack". Which will cause verifier to warn and incorrectly reject such programs. Writes into stack via non-R10 register are rare. llvm always generates canonical stack spill/fill. For such pathological case fall back to conservative precision tracking instead of rejecting. Reported-by: syzbot+c8d66267fd2b5955287e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: b5dc0163d8fd ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: handle 32-bit zext during constant blinding

2019-08-26T21:05:01+00:00

Since BPF constant blinding is performed after the verifier pass, the ALU32 instructions inserted for doubleword immediate loads don't have a corresponding zext instruction. This is causing a kernel oops on powerpc and can be reproduced by running 'test_cgroup_storage' with bpf_jit_harden=2. Fix this by emitting BPF_ZEXT during constant blinding if prog->aux->verifier_zext is set. Fixes: a4b1d3c1ddf6cb ("bpf: verifier: insert zero extension according to analysis result") Reported-by: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: fix use after free in prog symbol exposure

2019-08-23T23:17:47+00:00

syzkaller managed to trigger the warning in bpf_jit_free() which checks via bpf_prog_kallsyms_verify_off() for potentially unlinked JITed BPF progs in kallsyms, and subsequently trips over GPF when walking kallsyms entries: [...] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device batadv0 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device batadv0 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9869 at kernel/bpf/core.c:810 bpf_jit_free+0x1e8/0x2a0 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 9869 Comm: kworker/0:7 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #1 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x113/0x167 lib/dump_stack.c:113 panic+0x212/0x40b kernel/panic.c:214 __warn.cold.8+0x1b/0x38 kernel/panic.c:571 report_bug+0x1a4/0x200 lib/bug.c:186 fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178 [inline] do_error_trap+0x11b/0x200 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:271 do_invalid_op+0x36/0x40 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:290 invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:973 RIP: 0010:bpf_jit_free+0x1e8/0x2a0 Code: 02 4c 89 e2 83 e2 07 38 d0 7f 08 84 c0 0f 85 86 00 00 00 48 ba 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de 0f b6 43 02 49 39 d6 0f 84 5f fe ff ff <0f> 0b e9 58 fe ff ff 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 e2 48 c1 RSP: 0018:ffff888092f67cd8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000007 RBX: ffffc90001947000 RCX: ffffffff816e9d88 RDX: dead000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff88808769f7f0 RBP: ffff888092f67d00 R08: fffffbfff1394059 R09: fffffbfff1394058 R10: fffffbfff1394058 R11: ffffffff89ca02c7 R12: ffffc90001947002 R13: ffffc90001947020 R14: ffffffff881eca80 R15: ffff88808769f7e8 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffbfff400d000 #PF error: [normal kernel read fault] PGD 21ffee067 P4D 21ffee067 PUD 21ffed067 PMD 9f942067 PTE 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 9869 Comm: kworker/0:7 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #1 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred RIP: 0010:bpf_get_prog_addr_region kernel/bpf/core.c:495 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_tree_comp kernel/bpf/core.c:558 [inline] RIP: 0010:__lt_find include/linux/rbtree_latch.h:115 [inline] RIP: 0010:latch_tree_find include/linux/rbtree_latch.h:208 [inline] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_kallsyms_find+0x107/0x2e0 kernel/bpf/core.c:632 Code: 00 f0 ff ff 44 38 c8 7f 08 84 c0 0f 85 fa 00 00 00 41 f6 45 02 01 75 02 0f 0b 48 39 da 0f 82 92 00 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 30 84 c0 74 08 3c 03 0f 8e 45 01 00 00 8b 03 48 c1 e0 [...] Upon further debugging, it turns out that whenever we trigger this issue, the kallsyms removal in bpf_prog_ksym_node_del() was /skipped/ but yet bpf_jit_free() reported that the entry is /in use/. Problem is that symbol exposure via bpf_prog_kallsyms_add() but also perf_event_bpf_event() were done /after/ bpf_prog_new_fd(). Once the fd is exposed to the public, a parallel close request came in right before we attempted to do the bpf_prog_kallsyms_add(). Given at this time the prog reference count is one, we start to rip everything underneath us via bpf_prog_release() -> bpf_prog_put(). The memory is eventually released via deferred free, so we're seeing that bpf_jit_free() has a kallsym entry because we added it from bpf_prog_load() but /after/ bpf_prog_put() from the remote CPU. Therefore, move both notifications /before/ we install the fd. The issue was never seen between bpf_prog_alloc_id() and bpf_prog_new_fd() because upon bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id() we'll take another reference to the BPF prog, so we're still holding the original reference from the bpf_prog_load(). Fixes: 6ee52e2a3fe4 ("perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT") Fixes: 74451e66d516 ("bpf: make jited programs visible in traces") Reported-by: syzbot+bd3bba6ff3fcea7a6ec6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Song Liu

bpf: fix precision tracking in presence of bpf2bpf calls

2019-08-23T23:17:12+00:00

While adding extra tests for precision tracking and extra infra to adjust verifier heuristics the existing test "calls: cross frame pruning - liveness propagation" started to fail. The root cause is the same as described in verifer.c comment: * Also if parent's curframe > frame where backtracking started, * the verifier need to mark registers in both frames, otherwise callees * may incorrectly prune callers. This is similar to * commit 7640ead93924 ("bpf: verifier: make sure callees don't prune with caller differences") * For now backtracking falls back into conservative marking. Turned out though that returning -ENOTSUPP from backtrack_insn() and doing mark_all_scalars_precise() in the current parentage chain is not enough. Depending on how is_state_visited() heuristic is creating parentage chain it's possible that callee will incorrectly prune caller. Fix the issue by setting precise=true earlier and more aggressively. Before this fix the precision tracking _within_ functions that don't do bpf2bpf calls would still work. Whereas now precision tracking is completely disabled when bpf2bpf calls are present anywhere in the program. No difference in cilium tests (they don't have bpf2bpf calls). No difference in test_progs though some of them have bpf2bpf calls, but precision tracking wasn't effective there. Fixes: b5dc0163d8fd ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf

2019-07-26T00:35:03+00:00

Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf 2019-07-25 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree. The main changes are: 1) fix segfault in libbpf, from Andrii. 2) fix gso_segs access, from Eric. 3) tls/sockmap fixes, from Jakub and John. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: fix narrower loads on s390

2019-07-23T20:59:33+00:00

The very first check in test_pkt_md_access is failing on s390, which happens because loading a part of a struct __sk_buff field produces an incorrect result. The preprocessed code of the check is: { __u8 tmp = *((volatile __u8 *)&skb->len + ((sizeof(skb->len) - sizeof(__u8)) / sizeof(__u8))); if (tmp != ((*(volatile __u32 *)&skb->len) & 0xFF)) return 2; }; clang generates the following code for it: 0: 71 21 00 03 00 00 00 00 r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 3) 1: 61 31 00 00 00 00 00 00 r3 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) 2: 57 30 00 00 00 00 00 ff r3 &= 255 3: 5d 23 00 1d 00 00 00 00 if r2 != r3 goto +29 Finally, verifier transforms it to: 0: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +104) 1: (bc) w2 = w2 2: (74) w2 >>= 24 3: (bc) w2 = w2 4: (54) w2 &= 255 5: (bc) w2 = w2 The problem is that when verifier emits the code to replace a partial load of a struct __sk_buff field (*(u8 *)(r1 + 3)) with a full load of struct sk_buff field (*(u32 *)(r1 + 104)), an optional shift and a bitwise AND, it assumes that the machine is little endian and incorrectly decides to use a shift. Adjust shift count calculation to account for endianness. Fixes: 31fd85816dbe ("bpf: permits narrower load from bpf program context fields") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov