<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/include/linux/mempolicy.h, branch v3.15</title>
<subtitle>Intel OpenBMC Linux kernel source tree (mirror)</subtitle>
<id>https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/atom?h=v3.15</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/atom?h=v3.15'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2014-04-07T23:35:54+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>mm, mempolicy: remove per-process flag</title>
<updated>2014-04-07T23:35:54+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Rientjes</name>
<email>rientjes@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2014-04-07T22:37:30+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=f0432d159601f96839f514f286eaa5b75c4112dc'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f0432d159601f96839f514f286eaa5b75c4112dc</id>
<content type='text'>
PF_MEMPOLICY is an unnecessary optimization for CONFIG_SLAB users.
There's no significant performance degradation to checking
current-&gt;mempolicy rather than current-&gt;flags &amp; PF_MEMPOLICY in the
allocation path, especially since this is considered unlikely().

Running TCP_RR with netperf-2.4.5 through localhost on 16 cpu machine with
64GB of memory and without a mempolicy:

	threads		before		after
	16		1249409		1244487
	32		1281786		1246783
	48		1239175		1239138
	64		1244642		1241841
	80		1244346		1248918
	96		1266436		1254316
	112		1307398		1312135
	128		1327607		1326502

Per-process flags are a scarce resource so we should free them up whenever
possible and make them available.  We'll be using it shortly for memcg oom
reserves.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes &lt;rientjes@google.com&gt;
Cc: Johannes Weiner &lt;hannes@cmpxchg.org&gt;
Cc: Michal Hocko &lt;mhocko@suse.cz&gt;
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki &lt;kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Cc: Christoph Lameter &lt;cl@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Cc: Pekka Enberg &lt;penberg@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Mel Gorman &lt;mgorman@suse.de&gt;
Cc: Oleg Nesterov &lt;oleg@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Jianguo Wu &lt;wujianguo@huawei.com&gt;
Cc: Tim Hockin &lt;thockin@google.com&gt;
Cc: Christoph Lameter &lt;cl@linux.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton &lt;akpm@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>mm, mempolicy: rename slab_node for clarity</title>
<updated>2014-04-07T23:35:54+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Rientjes</name>
<email>rientjes@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2014-04-07T22:37:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=2a389610a7331d22344698f23ef2e8c55b2cde7b'/>
<id>urn:sha1:2a389610a7331d22344698f23ef2e8c55b2cde7b</id>
<content type='text'>
slab_node() is actually a mempolicy function, so rename it to
mempolicy_slab_node() to make it clearer that it used for processes with
mempolicies.

At the same time, cleanup its code by saving numa_mem_id() in a local
variable (since we require a node with memory, not just any node) and
remove an obsolete comment that assumes the mempolicy is actually passed
into the function.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes &lt;rientjes@google.com&gt;
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter &lt;cl@linux.com&gt;
Cc: Johannes Weiner &lt;hannes@cmpxchg.org&gt;
Cc: Michal Hocko &lt;mhocko@suse.cz&gt;
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki &lt;kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Cc: Christoph Lameter &lt;cl@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Cc: Pekka Enberg &lt;penberg@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Mel Gorman &lt;mgorman@suse.de&gt;
Cc: Oleg Nesterov &lt;oleg@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Jianguo Wu &lt;wujianguo@huawei.com&gt;
Cc: Tim Hockin &lt;thockin@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton &lt;akpm@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>mm, mempolicy: remove unneeded functions for UMA configs</title>
<updated>2014-01-22T00:19:44+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Rientjes</name>
<email>rientjes@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2014-01-21T23:49:10+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=d80be7c75136fb58ed7264ac8a49dd917ace77a1'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d80be7c75136fb58ed7264ac8a49dd917ace77a1</id>
<content type='text'>
Mempolicies only exist for CONFIG_NUMA configurations.  Therefore, a
certain class of functions are unneeded in configurations where
CONFIG_NUMA is disabled such as functions that duplicate existing
mempolicies, lookup existing policies, set certain mempolicy traits, or
test mempolicies for certain attributes.

Remove the unneeded functions so that any future callers get a compile-
time error and protect their code with CONFIG_NUMA as required.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes &lt;rientjes@google.com&gt;
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro &lt;kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Cc: Johannes Weiner &lt;hannes@cmpxchg.org&gt;
Cc: Michal Hocko &lt;mhocko@suse.cz&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton &lt;akpm@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>mm, mempolicy: make mpol_to_str robust and always succeed</title>
<updated>2013-11-13T03:09:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Rientjes</name>
<email>rientjes@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2013-11-12T23:07:28+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=948927ee9e4f35f287e61a79c9f0e85ca2202c7d'/>
<id>urn:sha1:948927ee9e4f35f287e61a79c9f0e85ca2202c7d</id>
<content type='text'>
mpol_to_str() should not fail.  Currently, it either fails because the
string buffer is too small or because a string hasn't been defined for a
mempolicy mode.

If a new mempolicy mode is introduced and no string is defined for it,
just warn and return "unknown".

If the buffer is too small, just truncate the string and return, the
same behavior as snprintf().

This also fixes a bug where there was no NULL-byte termination when doing
*p++ = '=' and *p++ ':' and maxlen has been reached.

Signed-off-by: David Rientjes &lt;rientjes@google.com&gt;
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro &lt;kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Cc: Chen Gang &lt;gang.chen@asianux.com&gt;
Cc: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Dave Jones &lt;davej@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton &lt;akpm@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>mm: numa: Limit NUMA scanning to migrate-on-fault VMAs</title>
<updated>2013-10-09T10:40:38+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Mel Gorman</name>
<email>mgorman@suse.de</email>
</author>
<published>2013-10-07T10:29:09+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=fc3147245d193bd0f57307859c698fa28a20b0fe'/>
<id>urn:sha1:fc3147245d193bd0f57307859c698fa28a20b0fe</id>
<content type='text'>
There is a 90% regression observed with a large Oracle performance test
on a 4 node system. Profiles indicated that the overhead was due to
contention on sp_lock when looking up shared memory policies. These
policies do not have the appropriate flags to allow them to be
automatically balanced so trapping faults on them is pointless. This
patch skips VMAs that do not have MPOL_F_MOF set.

[riel@redhat.com: Initial patch]

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman &lt;mgorman@suse.de&gt;
Reported-and-tested-by: Joe Mario &lt;jmario@redhat.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli &lt;aarcange@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Johannes Weiner &lt;hannes@cmpxchg.org&gt;
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju &lt;srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-32-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar &lt;mingo@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>mm: migrate: remove VM_HUGETLB from vma flag check in vma_migratable()</title>
<updated>2013-09-11T22:57:48+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Naoya Horiguchi</name>
<email>n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com</email>
</author>
<published>2013-09-11T21:22:08+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=71ea2efb1e936a127690a0a540b3a6162f95e48a'/>
<id>urn:sha1:71ea2efb1e936a127690a0a540b3a6162f95e48a</id>
<content type='text'>
Enable hugepage migration from migrate_pages(2), move_pages(2), and
mbind(2).

Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi &lt;n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com&gt;
Acked-by: Hillf Danton &lt;dhillf@gmail.com&gt;
Acked-by: Andi Kleen &lt;ak@linux.intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li &lt;liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Cc: Mel Gorman &lt;mgorman@suse.de&gt;
Cc: Hugh Dickins &lt;hughd@google.com&gt;
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro &lt;kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Cc: Michal Hocko &lt;mhocko@suse.cz&gt;
Cc: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" &lt;aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton &lt;akpm@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>mm: mempolicy: turn vma_set_policy() into vma_dup_policy()</title>
<updated>2013-09-11T22:57:00+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Oleg Nesterov</name>
<email>oleg@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2013-09-11T21:20:14+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=ef0855d334e1e4af7c3e0c42146a8479ea14a5ab'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ef0855d334e1e4af7c3e0c42146a8479ea14a5ab</id>
<content type='text'>
Simple cleanup.  Every user of vma_set_policy() does the same work, this
looks a bit annoying imho.  And the new trivial helper which does
mpol_dup() + vma_set_policy() to simplify the callers.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov &lt;oleg@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro &lt;kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Cc: Mel Gorman &lt;mgorman@suse.de&gt;
Cc: Rik van Riel &lt;riel@redhat.com&gt;
Cc: Andi Kleen &lt;andi@firstfloor.org&gt;
Cc: David Rientjes &lt;rientjes@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton &lt;akpm@linux-foundation.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>mm: mempolicy: Convert shared_policy mutex to spinlock</title>
<updated>2013-01-03T01:32:13+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Mel Gorman</name>
<email>mgorman@suse.de</email>
</author>
<published>2012-12-21T23:10:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=42288fe366c4f1ce7522bc9f27d0bc2a81c55264'/>
<id>urn:sha1:42288fe366c4f1ce7522bc9f27d0bc2a81c55264</id>
<content type='text'>
Sasha was fuzzing with trinity and reported the following problem:

  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:269
  in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 6361, name: trinity-main
  2 locks held by trinity-main/6361:
   #0:  (&amp;mm-&gt;mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [&lt;ffffffff810aa314&gt;] __do_page_fault+0x1e4/0x4f0
   #1:  (&amp;(&amp;mm-&gt;page_table_lock)-&gt;rlock){+.+...}, at: [&lt;ffffffff8122f017&gt;] handle_pte_fault+0x3f7/0x6a0
  Pid: 6361, comm: trinity-main Tainted: G        W
  3.7.0-rc2-next-20121024-sasha-00001-gd95ef01-dirty #74
  Call Trace:
    __might_sleep+0x1c3/0x1e0
    mutex_lock_nested+0x29/0x50
    mpol_shared_policy_lookup+0x2e/0x90
    shmem_get_policy+0x2e/0x30
    get_vma_policy+0x5a/0xa0
    mpol_misplaced+0x41/0x1d0
    handle_pte_fault+0x465/0x6a0

This was triggered by a different version of automatic NUMA balancing
but in theory the current version is vunerable to the same problem.

do_numa_page
  -&gt; numa_migrate_prep
    -&gt; mpol_misplaced
      -&gt; get_vma_policy
        -&gt; shmem_get_policy

It's very unlikely this will happen as shared pages are not marked
pte_numa -- see the page_mapcount() check in change_pte_range() -- but
it is possible.

To address this, this patch restores sp-&gt;lock as originally implemented
by Kosaki Motohiro.  In the path where get_vma_policy() is called, it
should not be calling sp_alloc() so it is not necessary to treat the PTL
specially.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro &lt;kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Tested-by: KOSAKI Motohiro &lt;kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman &lt;mgorman@suse.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>mempolicy: remove arg from mpol_parse_str, mpol_to_str</title>
<updated>2013-01-02T17:27:10+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Hugh Dickins</name>
<email>hughd@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2013-01-02T10:04:23+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=a7a88b23737095e6c18a20c5d4eef9e25ec5b829'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a7a88b23737095e6c18a20c5d4eef9e25ec5b829</id>
<content type='text'>
Remove the unused argument (formerly no_context) from mpol_parse_str()
and from mpol_to_str().

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins &lt;hughd@google.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds &lt;torvalds@linux-foundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge tag 'balancenuma-v11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma</title>
<updated>2012-12-16T23:18:08+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@linux-foundation.org</email>
</author>
<published>2012-12-16T22:33:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=3d59eebc5e137bd89c6351e4c70e90ba1d0dc234'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3d59eebc5e137bd89c6351e4c70e90ba1d0dc234</id>
<content type='text'>
Pull Automatic NUMA Balancing bare-bones from Mel Gorman:
 "There are three implementations for NUMA balancing, this tree
  (balancenuma), numacore which has been developed in tip/master and
  autonuma which is in aa.git.

  In almost all respects balancenuma is the dumbest of the three because
  its main impact is on the VM side with no attempt to be smart about
  scheduling.  In the interest of getting the ball rolling, it would be
  desirable to see this much merged for 3.8 with the view to building
  scheduler smarts on top and adapting the VM where required for 3.9.

  The most recent set of comparisons available from different people are

    mel:    https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/9/108
    mingo:  https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/7/331
    tglx:   https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/437
    srikar: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/397

  The results are a mixed bag.  In my own tests, balancenuma does
  reasonably well.  It's dumb as rocks and does not regress against
  mainline.  On the other hand, Ingo's tests shows that balancenuma is
  incapable of converging for this workloads driven by perf which is bad
  but is potentially explained by the lack of scheduler smarts.  Thomas'
  results show balancenuma improves on mainline but falls far short of
  numacore or autonuma.  Srikar's results indicate we all suffer on a
  large machine with imbalanced node sizes.

  My own testing showed that recent numacore results have improved
  dramatically, particularly in the last week but not universally.
  We've butted heads heavily on system CPU usage and high levels of
  migration even when it shows that overall performance is better.
  There are also cases where it regresses.  Of interest is that for
  specjbb in some configurations it will regress for lower numbers of
  warehouses and show gains for higher numbers which is not reported by
  the tool by default and sometimes missed in treports.  Recently I
  reported for numacore that the JVM was crashing with
  NullPointerExceptions but currently it's unclear what the source of
  this problem is.  Initially I thought it was in how numacore batch
  handles PTEs but I'm no longer think this is the case.  It's possible
  numacore is just able to trigger it due to higher rates of migration.

  These reports were quite late in the cycle so I/we would like to start
  with this tree as it contains much of the code we can agree on and has
  not changed significantly over the last 2-3 weeks."

* tag 'balancenuma-v11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma: (50 commits)
  mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable
  mm/rmap: Convert the struct anon_vma::mutex to an rwsem
  mm: migrate: Account a transhuge page properly when rate limiting
  mm: numa: Account for failed allocations and isolations as migration failures
  mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case build fix
  mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case.
  mm: sched: numa: Delay PTE scanning until a task is scheduled on a new node
  mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing if !SCHED_DEBUG
  mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing
  mm: sched: Adapt the scanning rate if a NUMA hinting fault does not migrate
  mm: numa: Use a two-stage filter to restrict pages being migrated for unlikely task&lt;-&gt;node relationships
  mm: numa: migrate: Set last_nid on newly allocated page
  mm: numa: split_huge_page: Transfer last_nid on tail page
  mm: numa: Introduce last_nid to the page frame
  sched: numa: Slowly increase the scanning period as NUMA faults are handled
  mm: numa: Rate limit setting of pte_numa if node is saturated
  mm: numa: Rate limit the amount of memory that is migrated between nodes
  mm: numa: Structures for Migrate On Fault per NUMA migration rate limiting
  mm: numa: Migrate pages handled during a pmd_numa hinting fault
  mm: numa: Migrate on reference policy
  ...
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
