BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/fs, branch v5.4.33

hfsplus: fix crash and filesystem corruption when deleting files

2020-04-17T08:50:22+00:00

commit 25efb2ffdf991177e740b2f63e92b4ec7d310a92 upstream. When removing files containing extended attributes, the hfsplus driver may remove the wrong entries from the attributes b-tree, causing major filesystem damage and in some cases even kernel crashes. To remove a file, all its extended attributes have to be removed as well. The driver does this by looking up all keys in the attributes b-tree with the cnid of the file. Each of these entries then gets deleted using the key used for searching, which doesn't contain the attribute's name when it should. Since the key doesn't contain the name, the deletion routine will not find the correct entry and instead remove the one in front of it. If parent nodes have to be modified, these become corrupt as well. This causes invalid links and unsorted entries that not even macOS's fsck_hfs is able to fix. To fix this, modify the search key before an entry is deleted from the attributes b-tree by copying the found entry's key into the search key, therefore ensuring that the correct entry gets removed from the tree. Signed-off-by: Simon Gander Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Anton Altaparmakov Cc: Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200327155541.1521-1-simon@tuxera.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ocfs2: no need try to truncate file beyond i_size

2020-04-17T08:50:21+00:00

commit 783fda856e1034dee90a873f7654c418212d12d7 upstream. Linux fallocate(2) with FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE mode set, its offset can exceed the inode size. Ocfs2 now doesn't allow that offset beyond inode size. This restriction is not necessary and violates fallocate(2) semantics. If fallocate(2) offset is beyond inode size, just return success and do nothing further. Otherwise, ocfs2 will crash the kernel. kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2//alloc.c:7264! ocfs2_truncate_inline+0x20f/0x360 [ocfs2] ocfs2_remove_inode_range+0x23c/0xcb0 [ocfs2] __ocfs2_change_file_space+0x4a5/0x650 [ocfs2] ocfs2_fallocate+0x83/0xa0 [ocfs2] vfs_fallocate+0x148/0x230 SyS_fallocate+0x48/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x170 Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Changwei Ge Cc: Gang He Cc: Jun Piao Cc: Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200407082754.17565-1-chge@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fs/filesystems.c: downgrade user-reachable WARN_ONCE() to pr_warn_once()

2020-04-17T08:50:21+00:00

commit 26c5d78c976ca298e59a56f6101a97b618ba3539 upstream. After request_module(), nothing is stopping the module from being unloaded until someone takes a reference to it via try_get_module(). The WARN_ONCE() in get_fs_type() is thus user-reachable, via userspace running 'rmmod' concurrently. Since WARN_ONCE() is for kernel bugs only, not for user-reachable situations, downgrade this warning to pr_warn_once(). Keep it printed once only, since the intent of this warning is to detect a bug in modprobe at boot time. Printing the warning more than once wouldn't really provide any useful extra information. Fixes: 41124db869b7 ("fs: warn in case userspace lied about modprobe return") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Jessica Yu Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Jeff Vander Stoep Cc: Jessica Yu Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Luis Chamberlain Cc: NeilBrown Cc: [4.13+] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200312202552.241885-3-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: fix a data race at inode->i_blocks

2020-04-17T08:50:21+00:00

commit 28936b62e71e41600bab319f262ea9f9b1027629 upstream. inode->i_blocks could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_do_update_inode [ext4] / inode_add_bytes write to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 22100 on cpu 118: inode_add_bytes+0x65/0xf0 __inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:689 (inlined by) inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:702 ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x418/0xca0 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1a6b/0x27b0 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x1a9/0x950 [ext4] _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4] ext4_get_block_unwritten+0x33/0x50 [ext4] __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0 __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50 ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4] ext4_da_write_begin+0x35f/0x8f0 [ext4] generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4] ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4] new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0 vfs_write+0x103/0x260 ksys_write+0x9d/0x130 __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe read to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 8 on cpu 65: ext4_do_update_inode+0x4a0/0xf60 [ext4] ext4_inode_blocks_set at fs/ext4/inode.c:4815 ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0xaf/0x160 [ext4] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x129/0x3e0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_extents+0x253/0x2d0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec+0xc5/0x150 [ext4] ext4_end_io_rsv_work+0x22c/0x350 [ext4] process_one_work+0x54f/0xb90 worker_thread+0x80/0x5f0 kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 4 locks held by kworker/u256:0/8: #0: ffff9a025abc4328 ((wq_completion)ext4-rsv-conversion){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #1: ffffab5a862dbe20 ((work_completion)(&ei->i_rsv_conversion_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #2: ffff9a025a9d0f58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2] #3: ffff9a00d4b985d8 (&(&ei->i_raw_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: ext4_do_update_inode+0xaa/0xf60 [ext4] irq event stamp: 3009267 hardirqs last enabled at (3009267): [] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790 hardirqs last disabled at (3009266): [] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790 softirqs last enabled at (3009230): [] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c softirqs last disabled at (3009223): [] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 65 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u256:0 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work [ext4] The plain read is outside of inode->i_lock critical section which results in a data race. Fix it by adding READ_ONCE() there. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222043258.2279-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

NFS: Fix a page leak in nfs_destroy_unlinked_subrequests()

2020-04-17T08:50:20+00:00

commit add42de31721fa29ed77a7ce388674d69f9d31a4 upstream. When we detach a subrequest from the list, we must also release the reference it holds to the parent. Fixes: 5b2b5187fa85 ("NFS: Fix nfs_page_group_destroy() and nfs_lock_and_join_requests() race cases") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.14+ Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

NFS: Fix use-after-free issues in nfs_pageio_add_request()

2020-04-17T08:50:20+00:00

commit dc9dc2febb17f72e9878eb540ad3996f7984239a upstream. We need to ensure that we create the mirror requests before calling nfs_pageio_add_request_mirror() on the request we are adding. Otherwise, we can end up with a use-after-free if the call to nfs_pageio_add_request_mirror() triggers I/O. Fixes: c917cfaf9bbe ("NFS: Fix up NFS I/O subrequest creation") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

nfsd: fsnotify on rmdir under nfsd/clients/

2020-04-17T08:50:20+00:00

commit 69afd267982e733a555fede4e85fe30329ed0588 upstream. Userspace should be able to monitor nfsd/clients/ to see when clients come and go, but we're failing to send fsnotify events. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

io_uring: honor original task RLIMIT_FSIZE

2020-04-17T08:50:16+00:00

commit 4ed734b0d0913e566a9d871e15d24eb240f269f7 upstream. With the previous fixes for number of files open checking, I added some debug code to see if we had other spots where we're checking rlimit() against the async io-wq workers. The only one I found was file size checking, which we should also honor. During write and fallocate prep, store the max file size and override that for the current ask if we're in io-wq worker context. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+ Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

erofs: correct the remaining shrink objects

2020-04-17T08:50:16+00:00

commit 9d5a09c6f3b5fb85af20e3a34827b5d27d152b34 upstream. The remaining count should not include successful shrink attempts. Fixes: e7e9a307be9d ("staging: erofs: introduce workstation for decompression") Cc: # 4.19+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200226081008.86348-1-gaoxiang25@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: use nofs allocations for running delayed items

2020-04-17T08:50:15+00:00

commit 351cbf6e4410e7ece05e35d0a07320538f2418b4 upstream. Zygo reported the following lockdep splat while testing the balance patches ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/1133 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888092f622c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.91+0x29/0x30 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x19/0x20 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x32/0x740 add_block_entry+0x45/0x260 btrfs_ref_tree_mod+0x6e2/0x8b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x789/0x880 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0xc6/0xf0 __btrfs_cow_block+0x270/0x940 btrfs_cow_block+0x1ba/0x3a0 btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0x1030 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x81/0xe0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x128/0x7d0 __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xf4/0x2a0 btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5cc/0x1390 insert_balance_item.isra.39+0x6b2/0x6e0 btrfs_balance+0x72d/0x18d0 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3de/0x4c0 btrfs_ioctl+0x30ab/0x44a0 ksys_ioctl+0xa1/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x77/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}: __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900 evict+0x19a/0x2c0 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0 kswapd+0x35a/0x800 kthread+0x1e9/0x210 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/1133: #0: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8fc380d8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0x1e8/0x410 #2: ffff8881e0e6c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#42){++++}, at: trylock_super+0x1b/0x70 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1133 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc1/0x11a print_circular_bug.isra.38.cold.57+0x145/0x14a check_noncircular+0x2a9/0x2f0 ? print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x130/0x130 ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x90/0x90 ? save_trace+0x3cc/0x420 __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550 ? btrfs_inode_clear_file_extent_range+0x9b/0xb0 ? register_lock_class+0x960/0x960 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0xc20/0xc20 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? check_chain_key+0x1e6/0x2e0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900 ? btrfs_setattr+0x840/0x840 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140 evict+0x19a/0x2c0 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0 ? invalidate_inodes+0x310/0x310 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? mem_cgroup_protected+0x13d/0x260 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0 ? mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x490/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x40 ? finish_task_switch+0xce/0x390 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 kswapd+0x35a/0x800 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0 ? finish_wait+0x110/0x110 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? __kthread_parkme+0xc6/0xe0 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0 kthread+0x1e9/0x210 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 This is because we hold that delayed node's mutex while doing tree operations. Fix this by just wrapping the searches in nofs. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman