BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/fs/isofs/inode.c, branch dev

isofs: avoid unused function warning

2014-11-19T18:09:37+00:00

With the isofs_hash() function removed, isofs_hash_ms() is the only user of isofs_hash_common(), but it's defined inside of an #ifdef, which triggers this gcc warning in ARM axm55xx_defconfig starting with v3.18-rc3: fs/isofs/inode.c:177:1: warning: 'isofs_hash_common' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] This patch moves the function inside of the same #ifdef section to avoid that warning, which seems the best compromise of a relatively harmless patch for a late -rc. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Fixes: b0afd8e5db7b ("isofs: don't bother with ->d_op for normal case") Signed-off-by: Al Viro

isofs: don't bother with ->d_op for normal case

2014-10-31T10:33:17+00:00

we only need it for joliet and case-insensitive mounts Signed-off-by: Al Viro

isofs: replace strnicmp with strncasecmp

2014-10-14T00:18:24+00:00

The kernel used to contain two functions for length-delimited, case-insensitive string comparison, strnicmp with correct semantics and a slightly buggy strncasecmp. The latter is the POSIX name, so strnicmp was renamed to strncasecmp, and strnicmp made into a wrapper for the new strncasecmp to avoid breaking existing users. To allow the compat wrapper strnicmp to be removed at some point in the future, and to avoid the extra indirection cost, do s/strnicmp/strncasecmp/g. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

isofs: Fix unbounded recursion when processing relocated directories

2014-08-19T16:29:30+00:00

We did not check relocated directory in any way when processing Rock Ridge 'CL' tag. Thus a corrupted isofs image can possibly have a CL entry pointing to another CL entry leading to possibly unbounded recursion in kernel code and thus stack overflow or deadlocks (if there is a loop created from CL entries). Fix the problem by not allowing CL entry to point to a directory entry with CL entry (such use makes no good sense anyway) and by checking whether CL entry doesn't point to itself. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Chris Evans Signed-off-by: Jan Kara

Merge branch 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs

2014-04-08T00:59:17+00:00

Pull ext3 improvements, cleanups, reiserfs fix from Jan Kara: "various cleanups for ext2, ext3, udf, isofs, a documentation update for quota, and a fix of a race in reiserfs readdir implementation" * 'for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs: reiserfs: fix race in readdir ext2: acl: remove unneeded include of linux/capability.h ext3: explicitly remove inode from orphan list after failed direct io fs/isofs/inode.c add __init to init_inodecache() ext3: Speedup WB_SYNC_ALL pass fs/quota/Kconfig: Update filesystems ext3: Update outdated comment before ext3_ordered_writepage() ext3: Update PF_MEMALLOC handling in ext3_write_inode() ext2/3: use prandom_u32() instead of get_random_bytes() ext3: remove an unneeded check in ext3_new_blocks() ext3: remove unneeded check in ext3_ordered_writepage() fs: Mark function as static in ext3/xattr_security.c fs: Mark function as static in ext3/dir.c fs: Mark function as static in ext2/xattr_security.c ext3: Add __init macro to init_inodecache ext2: Add __init macro to init_inodecache udf: Add __init macro to init_inodecache fs: udf: parse_options: blocksize check

fs: push sync_filesystem() down to the file system's remount_fs()

2014-03-13T14:14:33+00:00

Previously, the no-op "mount -o mount /dev/xxx" operation when the file system is already mounted read-write causes an implied, unconditional syncfs(). This seems pretty stupid, and it's certainly documented or guaraunteed to do this, nor is it particularly useful, except in the case where the file system was mounted rw and is getting remounted read-only. However, it's possible that there might be some file systems that are actually depending on this behavior. In most file systems, it's probably fine to only call sync_filesystem() when transitioning from read-write to read-only, and there are some file systems where this is not needed at all (for example, for a pseudo-filesystem or something like romfs). Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Artem Bityutskiy Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov Cc: Jan Kara Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi Cc: Anders Larsen Cc: Phillip Lougher Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Mikulas Patocka Cc: Petr Vandrovec Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Cc: samba-technical@lists.samba.org Cc: codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org

fs/isofs/inode.c add __init to init_inodecache()

2014-03-12T21:52:39+00:00

init_inodecache is only called by __init init_iso9660_fs Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick Signed-off-by: Jan Kara

isofs: don't pass dentry to isofs_hash{i,}_common()

2013-10-25T03:34:59+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

isofs: Refuse RW mount of the filesystem instead of making it RO

2013-07-31T20:14:50+00:00

Refuse RW mount of isofs filesystem. So far we just silently changed it to RO mount but when the media is writeable, block layer won't notice this change and thus will think device is used RW and will block eject button of the drive. That is unexpected by users because for non-writeable media eject button works just fine. Userspace mount(8) command handles this just fine and retries mounting with MS_RDONLY set so userspace shouldn't see any regression. Plus any tool mounting isofs is likely confronted with the case of read-only media where block layer already refuses to mount the filesystem without MS_RDONLY set so our behavior shouldn't be anything new for it. Reported-by: Hui Wang Signed-off-by: Jan Kara

Don't pass inode to ->d_hash() and ->d_compare()

2013-06-29T08:57:36+00:00

Instances either don't look at it at all (the majority of cases) or only want it to find the superblock (which can be had as dentry->d_sb). A few cases that want more are actually safe with dentry->d_inode - the only precaution needed is the check that it hadn't been replaced with NULL by rmdir() or by overwriting rename(), which case should be simply treated as cache miss. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Al Viro