<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/drivers/pwm/core.c, branch dev-5.2</title>
<subtitle>Intel OpenBMC Linux kernel source tree (mirror)</subtitle>
<id>https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/atom?h=dev-5.2</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/atom?h=dev-5.2'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2019-05-21T09:28:46+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 18</title>
<updated>2019-05-21T09:28:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Thomas Gleixner</name>
<email>tglx@linutronix.de</email>
</author>
<published>2019-05-19T13:51:48+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=c82ee6d3beaa489058c1fe1ca710042a07df9d40'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c82ee6d3beaa489058c1fe1ca710042a07df9d40</id>
<content type='text'>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):

  this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
  it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
  the free software foundation either version 2 or at your option any
  later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will
  be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty
  of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu
  general public license for more details you should have received a
  copy of the gnu general public license along with this program see
  the file copying if not write to the free software foundation 675
  mass ave cambridge ma 02139 usa

extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier

  GPL-2.0-or-later

has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 52 file(s).

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner &lt;tglx@linutronix.de&gt;
Reviewed-by: Jilayne Lovejoy &lt;opensource@jilayne.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Steve Winslow &lt;swinslow@gmail.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart &lt;kstewart@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal &lt;allison@lohutok.net&gt;
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190519154042.342335923@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pwm: Clear chip_data in pwm_put()</title>
<updated>2019-05-09T15:09:54+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Uwe Kleine-König</name>
<email>u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de</email>
</author>
<published>2019-03-25T09:49:33+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=e926b12c611c2095c7976e2ed31753ad6eb5ff1a'/>
<id>urn:sha1:e926b12c611c2095c7976e2ed31753ad6eb5ff1a</id>
<content type='text'>
After a PWM is disposed by its user the per chip data becomes invalid.
Clear the data in common code instead of the device drivers to get
consistent behaviour. Before this patch only three of nine drivers
cleaned up here.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König &lt;u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding &lt;thierry.reding@gmail.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pwm: Fix deadlock warning when removing PWM device</title>
<updated>2019-03-20T11:21:31+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Phong Hoang</name>
<email>phong.hoang.wz@renesas.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-03-19T10:40:08+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=347ab9480313737c0f1aaa08e8f2e1a791235535'/>
<id>urn:sha1:347ab9480313737c0f1aaa08e8f2e1a791235535</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch fixes deadlock warning if removing PWM device
when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled.

This issue can be reproceduced by the following steps on
the R-Car H3 Salvator-X board if the backlight is disabled:

 # cd /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0
 # echo 0 &gt; export
 # ls
 device  export  npwm  power  pwm0  subsystem  uevent  unexport
 # cd device/driver
 # ls
 bind  e6e31000.pwm  uevent  unbind
 # echo e6e31000.pwm &gt; unbind

[   87.659974] ======================================================
[   87.666149] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[   87.672327] 5.0.0 #7 Not tainted
[   87.675549] ------------------------------------------------------
[   87.681723] bash/2986 is trying to acquire lock:
[   87.686337] 000000005ea0e178 (kn-&gt;count#58){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0
[   87.694528]
[   87.694528] but task is already holding lock:
[   87.700353] 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c
[   87.707405]
[   87.707405] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[   87.707405]
[   87.715574]
[   87.715574] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[   87.723048]
[   87.723048] -&gt; #1 (pwm_lock){+.+.}:
[   87.728017]        __mutex_lock+0x70/0x7e4
[   87.732108]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
[   87.736547]        pwm_request_from_chip.part.6+0x34/0x74
[   87.741940]        pwm_request_from_chip+0x20/0x40
[   87.746725]        export_store+0x6c/0x1f4
[   87.750820]        dev_attr_store+0x18/0x28
[   87.754998]        sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64
[   87.759175]        kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8
[   87.763615]        __vfs_write+0x40/0x184
[   87.767619]        vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c
[   87.771448]        ksys_write+0x58/0xbc
[   87.775278]        __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
[   87.779721]        el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124
[   87.783986]        el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24
[   87.788858]        el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18
[   87.792947]
[   87.792947] -&gt; #0 (kn-&gt;count#58){++++}:
[   87.798260]        lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c
[   87.802353]        __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4
[   87.806790]        kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0
[   87.811836]        remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78
[   87.816447]        sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98
[   87.820971]        sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c
[   87.825583]        device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c
[   87.830197]        device_del+0x11c/0x33c
[   87.834201]        device_unregister+0x14/0x2c
[   87.838638]        pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c
[   87.843509]        pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c
[   87.847773]        rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34
[   87.852039]        platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64
[   87.856651]        device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c
[   87.862391]        device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c
[   87.867175]        unbind_store+0xe0/0x124
[   87.871265]        drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30
[   87.875442]        sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64
[   87.879618]        kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8
[   87.884055]        __vfs_write+0x40/0x184
[   87.888057]        vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c
[   87.891887]        ksys_write+0x58/0xbc
[   87.895716]        __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
[   87.900154]        el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124
[   87.904417]        el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24
[   87.909289]        el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18
[   87.913378]
[   87.913378] other info that might help us debug this:
[   87.913378]
[   87.921374]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   87.921374]
[   87.927286]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   87.931808]        ----                    ----
[   87.936331]   lock(pwm_lock);
[   87.939293]                                lock(kn-&gt;count#58);
[   87.945120]                                lock(pwm_lock);
[   87.950599]   lock(kn-&gt;count#58);
[   87.953908]
[   87.953908]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   87.953908]
[   87.959821] 4 locks held by bash/2986:
[   87.963563]  #0: 00000000ace7bc30 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x188/0x19c
[   87.971044]  #1: 00000000287991b2 (&amp;of-&gt;mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xb4/0x1e8
[   87.978872]  #2: 00000000f739d016 (&amp;dev-&gt;mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x21c
[   87.988001]  #3: 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c
[   87.995481]
[   87.995481] stack backtrace:
[   87.999836] CPU: 0 PID: 2986 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.0.0 #7
[   88.005489] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a7795 ES1.x (DT)
[   88.012791] Call trace:
[   88.015235]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190
[   88.018891]  show_stack+0x14/0x1c
[   88.022204]  dump_stack+0xb0/0xec
[   88.025514]  print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x1d0/0x2e0
[   88.030385]  __lock_acquire+0x1318/0x1864
[   88.034388]  lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c
[   88.037958]  __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4
[   88.041874]  kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0
[   88.046398]  remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78
[   88.050487]  sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98
[   88.054490]  sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c
[   88.058580]  device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c
[   88.062671]  device_del+0x11c/0x33c
[   88.066154]  device_unregister+0x14/0x2c
[   88.070070]  pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c
[   88.074421]  pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c
[   88.078163]  rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34
[   88.081906]  platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64
[   88.085996]  device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c
[   88.091215]  device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c
[   88.095478]  unbind_store+0xe0/0x124
[   88.099048]  drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30
[   88.102704]  sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64
[   88.106359]  kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8
[   88.110275]  __vfs_write+0x40/0x184
[   88.113757]  vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c
[   88.117065]  ksys_write+0x58/0xbc
[   88.120374]  __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
[   88.124291]  el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124
[   88.128034]  el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24
[   88.132384]  el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18

The sysfs unexport in pwmchip_remove() is completely asymmetric
to what we do in pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and commit 0733424c9ba9
("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") is a strong indication
that this was wrong to begin with. We should just move
pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() where it belongs, which is right after
pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). In that case, we do not need
separate functions anymore either.

We also really want to remove sysfs irrespective of whether or not
the chip will be removed as a result of pwmchip_remove(). We can only
assume that the driver will be gone after that, so we shouldn't leave
any dangling sysfs files around.

This warning disappears if we move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() to
the top of pwmchip_remove(), pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children().
That way it is also outside of the pwm_lock section, which indeed
doesn't seem to be needed.

Moving the pwmchip_sysfs_export() call outside of that section also
seems fine and it'd be perfectly symmetric with pwmchip_remove() again.

So, this patch fixes them.

Signed-off-by: Phong Hoang &lt;phong.hoang.wz@renesas.com&gt;
[shimoda: revise the commit log and code]
Fixes: 76abbdde2d95 ("pwm: Add sysfs interface")
Fixes: 0733424c9ba9 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal")
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda &lt;yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com&gt;
Tested-by: Hoan Nguyen An &lt;na-hoan@jinso.co.jp&gt;
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven &lt;geert+renesas@glider.be&gt;
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman &lt;horms+renesas@verge.net.au&gt;
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König &lt;u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding &lt;thierry.reding@gmail.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pwm: Drop per-chip dbg_show callback</title>
<updated>2019-01-10T08:34:12+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Uwe Kleine-König</name>
<email>u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de</email>
</author>
<published>2019-01-07T19:49:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=cc2d22477779f189595db5c515bd5ef9c75a1f35'/>
<id>urn:sha1:cc2d22477779f189595db5c515bd5ef9c75a1f35</id>
<content type='text'>
This callback was introduced in commit 62099abf67a2 ("pwm: Add debugfs
interface") in 2012 and up to now there is not a single user. So drop
this unused code.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König &lt;u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de&gt;
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: remove kerneldoc for -&gt;dbg_show()]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding &lt;thierry.reding@gmail.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pwm: Don't use memcmp() to compare state variables</title>
<updated>2019-01-10T08:32:23+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Uwe Kleine-König</name>
<email>u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de</email>
</author>
<published>2019-01-07T19:49:37+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=309b32fb97d8cf0771373fb55e16b2852840c9aa'/>
<id>urn:sha1:309b32fb97d8cf0771373fb55e16b2852840c9aa</id>
<content type='text'>
Given that struct pwm_state is sparse (at least on some platforms),
variables of this type might represent the same state because all fields
are pairwise identical but still memcmp() returns a difference because
some of the unused bits are different.

To prevent surprises compare member by member instead of the whole
occupied memory.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König &lt;u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding &lt;thierry.reding@gmail.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pwm: Silently error out on EPROBE_DEFER</title>
<updated>2017-07-06T06:29:16+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jerome Brunet</name>
<email>jbrunet@baylibre.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-05-23T16:05:03+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=93c292ef3cbb46db78853763fc4d9a5b9dfb97d5'/>
<id>urn:sha1:93c292ef3cbb46db78853763fc4d9a5b9dfb97d5</id>
<content type='text'>
In of_pwm_get(), if we fail to get the PWM chip due to probe deferal, we
shouldn't print an error message. Just be silent in this case.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet &lt;jbrunet@baylibre.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber &lt;afaerber@suse.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding &lt;thierry.reding@gmail.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pwm: Try to load modules during pwm_get()</title>
<updated>2017-01-30T08:36:42+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Hans de Goede</name>
<email>hdegoede@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-01-22T16:14:08+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=b526a314263ea217b8fa9758dca5dc245fd49997'/>
<id>urn:sha1:b526a314263ea217b8fa9758dca5dc245fd49997</id>
<content type='text'>
Add a module name string to the pwm_lookup struct and if specified try
to load the module using request_module() if pwmchip_find_by_name() is
unable to find the PWM chip.

This is a last resort to work around drivers that can't - and can't be
made to - deal with deferred probe.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede &lt;hdegoede@redhat.com&gt;
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: rename new macro, reword commit message]
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: add comment explaining use-case]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding &lt;thierry.reding@gmail.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pwm: Don't hold pwm_lookup_lock longer than necessary</title>
<updated>2017-01-30T08:19:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Hans de Goede</name>
<email>hdegoede@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-01-22T16:14:07+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=69efb3439ccf2ce72e01edde05d2c63d624e251e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:69efb3439ccf2ce72e01edde05d2c63d624e251e</id>
<content type='text'>
There is no need to hold pwm_lookup_lock after we're done with looping
over pwm_lookup_list, so release it earlier.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede &lt;hdegoede@redhat.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding &lt;thierry.reding@gmail.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pwm: Make the PWM_POLARITY flag in DTB optional</title>
<updated>2017-01-30T08:13:34+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Lothar Wassmann</name>
<email>LW@KARO-electronics.de</email>
</author>
<published>2017-01-29T21:54:13+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=42883cbc086b3f7aca9f1754f2d570af922825fc'/>
<id>urn:sha1:42883cbc086b3f7aca9f1754f2d570af922825fc</id>
<content type='text'>
Change the PWM chip driver registration so that a chip driver that
supports polarity inversion can still be used with DTBs that don't
provide the polarity flag as part of the specifier.

This is done to provide polarity inversion support for the pwm-imx
driver without having to modify all existing DTS files.

Signed-off-by: Lothar Wassmann &lt;LW@KARO-electronics.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV &lt;bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com&gt;
Suggested-by: Sascha Hauer &lt;s.hauer@pengutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski &lt;l.majewski@majess.pl&gt;
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon &lt;boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding &lt;thierry.reding@gmail.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pwm: Print error messages with pr_err() instead of pr_debug()</title>
<updated>2017-01-30T08:13:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Lothar Wassmann</name>
<email>LW@KARO-electronics.de</email>
</author>
<published>2017-01-29T21:54:05+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=f2dafc095018fcc6a71793cfefdd490c9f1c63be'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f2dafc095018fcc6a71793cfefdd490c9f1c63be</id>
<content type='text'>
Make the messages that are printed in case of fatal errors actually
visible to the user without having to recompile the driver with
debugging enabled.

Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann &lt;LW@KARO-electronics.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV &lt;bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon &lt;boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding &lt;thierry.reding@gmail.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
