BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/drivers/md/bcache/journal.c, branch dev-5.2

bcache: Revert "bcache: free heap cache_set->flush_btree in bch_journal_free"

2019-07-26T07:10:52+00:00

commit ba82c1ac1667d6efb91a268edb13fc9cdaecec9b upstream. This reverts commit 6268dc2c4703aabfb0b35681be709acf4c2826c6. This patch depends on commit c4dc2497d50d ("bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal") which is reverted in previous patch. So revert this one too. Fixes: 6268dc2c4703 ("bcache: free heap cache_set->flush_btree in bch_journal_free") Signed-off-by: Coly Li Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shenghui Wang Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: Revert "bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal"

2019-07-26T07:10:52+00:00

commit 249a5f6da57c28a903c75d81505d58ec8c10030d upstream. This reverts commit c4dc2497d50d9c6fb16aa0d07b6a14f3b2adb1e0. This patch enlarges a race between normal btree flush code path and flush_btree_write(), which causes deadlock when journal space is exhausted. Reverts this patch makes the race window from 128 btree nodes to only 1 btree nodes. Fixes: c4dc2497d50d ("bcache: fix high CPU occupancy during journal") Signed-off-by: Coly Li Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tang Junhui Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bcache: check CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE bit in bch_journal()

2019-07-26T07:10:39+00:00

[ Upstream commit 383ff2183ad16a8842d1fbd9dd3e1cbd66813e64 ] When too many I/O errors happen on cache set and CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE bit is set, bch_journal() may continue to work because the journaling bkey might be still in write set yet. The caller of bch_journal() may believe the journal still work but the truth is in-memory journal write set won't be written into cache device any more. This behavior may introduce potential inconsistent metadata status. This patch checks CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE bit at the head of bch_journal(), if the bit is set, bch_journal() returns NULL immediately to notice caller to know journal does not work. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: fix return value error in bch_journal_read()

2019-07-26T07:10:39+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0ae49cb7aa005ed18fe8f4d6ccf73019b78ac7b2 ] When everything is OK in bch_journal_read(), finally the return value is returned by, return ret; which assumes ret will be 0 here. This assumption is wrong when all journal buckets as are full and filled with valid journal entries. In such cache the last location referencess read_bucket() sets 'ret' to 1, which means new jset added into jset list. The jset list is list 'journal' in caller run_cache_set(). Return 1 to run_cache_set() means something wrong and the cache set won't start, but indeed everything is OK. This patch changes the line at end of bch_journal_read() to directly return 0 since everything if verything is good. Then a bogus error is fixed. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bcache: make is_discard_enabled() static

2019-05-01T12:34:09+00:00

It's not used outside this file. Fixes: 631207314d88 ("bcache: fix failure in journal relplay") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: fix failure in journal relplay

2019-04-24T16:56:28+00:00

journal replay failed with messages: Sep 10 19:10:43 ceph kernel: bcache: error on bb379a64-e44e-4812-b91d-a5599871a3b1: bcache: journal entries 2057493-2057567 missing! (replaying 2057493-2076601), disabling caching The reason is in journal_reclaim(), when discard is enabled, we send discard command and reclaim those journal buckets whose seq is old than the last_seq_now, but before we write a journal with last_seq_now, the machine is restarted, so the journal with the last_seq_now is not written to the journal bucket, and the last_seq_wrote in the newest journal is old than last_seq_now which we expect to be, so when we doing replay, journals from last_seq_wrote to last_seq_now are missing. It's hard to write a journal immediately after journal_reclaim(), and it harmless if those missed journal are caused by discarding since those journals are already wrote to btree node. So, if miss seqs are started from the beginning journal, we treat it as normal, and only print a message to show the miss journal, and point out it maybe caused by discarding. Patch v2 add a judgement condition to ignore the missed journal only when discard enabled as Coly suggested. (Coly Li: rebase the patch with other changes in bch_journal_replay()) Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui Tested-by: Dennis Schridde Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: return error immediately in bch_journal_replay()

2019-04-24T16:56:28+00:00

When failure happens inside bch_journal_replay(), calling cache_set_err_on() and handling the failure in async way is not a good idea. Because after bch_journal_replay() returns, registering code will continue to execute following steps, and unregistering code triggered by cache_set_err_on() is running in same time. First it is unnecessary to handle failure and unregister cache set in an async way, second there might be potential race condition to run register and unregister code for same cache set. So in this patch, if failure happens in bch_journal_replay(), we don't call cache_set_err_on(), and just print out the same error message to kernel message buffer, then return -EIO immediately caller. Then caller can detect such failure and handle it in synchrnozied way. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: never set KEY_PTRS of journal key to 0 in journal_reclaim()

2019-04-24T16:56:27+00:00

In journal_reclaim() ja->cur_idx of each cache will be update to reclaim available journal buckets. Variable 'int n' is used to count how many cache is successfully reclaimed, then n is set to c->journal.key by SET_KEY_PTRS(). Later in journal_write_unlocked(), a for_each_cache() loop will write the jset data onto each cache. The problem is, if all jouranl buckets on each cache is full, the following code in journal_reclaim(), 529 for_each_cache(ca, c, iter) { 530 struct journal_device *ja = &ca->journal; 531 unsigned int next = (ja->cur_idx + 1) % ca->sb.njournal_buckets; 532 533 /* No space available on this device */ 534 if (next == ja->discard_idx) 535 continue; 536 537 ja->cur_idx = next; 538 k->ptr[n++] = MAKE_PTR(0, 539 bucket_to_sector(c, ca->sb.d[ja->cur_idx]), 540 ca->sb.nr_this_dev); 541 } 542 543 bkey_init(k); 544 SET_KEY_PTRS(k, n); If there is no available bucket to reclaim, the if() condition at line 534 will always true, and n remains 0. Then at line 544, SET_KEY_PTRS() will set KEY_PTRS field of c->journal.key to 0. Setting KEY_PTRS field of c->journal.key to 0 is wrong. Because in journal_write_unlocked() the journal data is written in following loop, 649 for (i = 0; i < KEY_PTRS(k); i++) { 650-671 submit journal data to cache device 672 } If KEY_PTRS field is set to 0 in jouranl_reclaim(), the journal data won't be written to cache device here. If system crahed or rebooted before bkeys of the lost journal entries written into btree nodes, data corruption will be reported during bcache reload after rebooting the system. Indeed there is only one cache in a cache set, there is no need to set KEY_PTRS field in journal_reclaim() at all. But in order to keep the for_each_cache() logic consistent for now, this patch fixes the above problem by not setting 0 KEY_PTRS of journal key, if there is no bucket available to reclaim. Signed-off-by: Coly Li Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: move definition of 'int ret' out of macro read_bucket()

2019-04-24T16:56:27+00:00

'int ret' is defined as a local variable inside macro read_bucket(). Since this macro is called multiple times, and following patches will use a 'int ret' variable in bch_journal_read(), this patch moves definition of 'int ret' from macro read_bucket() to range of function bch_journal_read(). Signed-off-by: Coly Li Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

bcache: print number of keys in trace_bcache_journal_write

2018-12-13T15:15:54+00:00

Sometimes flush journal may be very frequent, so it's useful to dump number of keys every time write journal. Signed-off-by: Guoju Fang Signed-off-by: Coly Li Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe