BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c, branch dev-5.4

block: drbd: remove a stray unlock in __drbd_send_protocol()

2019-11-08T13:55:22+00:00

There are two callers of this function and they both unlock the mutex so this ends up being a double unlock. Fixes: 44ed167da748 ("drbd: rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference() for tconn->net_conf") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

signal: Allow cifs and drbd to receive their terminating signals

2019-08-19T11:34:13+00:00

My recent to change to only use force_sig for a synchronous events wound up breaking signal reception cifs and drbd. I had overlooked the fact that by default kthreads start out with all signals set to SIG_IGN. So a change I thought was safe turned out to have made it impossible for those kernel thread to catch their signals. Reverting the work on force_sig is a bad idea because what the code was doing was very much a misuse of force_sig. As the way force_sig ultimately allowed the signal to happen was to change the signal handler to SIG_DFL. Which after the first signal will allow userspace to send signals to these kernel threads. At least for wake_ack_receiver in drbd that does not appear actively wrong. So correct this problem by adding allow_kernel_signal that will allow signals whose siginfo reports they were sent by the kernel through, but will not allow userspace generated signals, and update cifs and drbd to call allow_kernel_signal in an appropriate place so that their thread can receive this signal. Fixing things this way ensures that userspace won't be able to send signals and cause problems, that it is clear which signals the threads are expecting to receive, and it guarantees that nothing else in the system will be affected. This change was partly inspired by similar cifs and drbd patches that added allow_signal. Reported-by: ronnie sahlberg Reported-by: Christoph Böhmwalder Tested-by: Christoph Böhmwalder Cc: Steve French Cc: Philipp Reisner Cc: David Laight Fixes: 247bc9470b1e ("cifs: fix rmmod regression in cifs.ko caused by force_sig changes") Fixes: 72abe3bcf091 ("signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of force_sig") Fixes: fee109901f39 ("signal/drbd: Use send_sig not force_sig") Fixes: 3cf5d076fb4d ("signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"

Merge tag 'for-5.3/block-20190708' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block

2019-07-09T17:45:06+00:00

Pull block updates from Jens Axboe: "This is the main block updates for 5.3. Nothing earth shattering or major in here, just fixes, additions, and improvements all over the map. This contains: - Series of documentation fixes (Bart) - Optimization of the blk-mq ctx get/put (Bart) - null_blk removal race condition fix (Bob) - req/bio_op() cleanups (Chaitanya) - Series cleaning up the segment accounting, and request/bio mapping (Christoph) - Series cleaning up the page getting/putting for bios (Christoph) - block cgroup cleanups and moving it to where it is used (Christoph) - block cgroup fixes (Tejun) - Series of fixes and improvements to bcache, most notably a write deadlock fix (Coly) - blk-iolatency STS_AGAIN and accounting fixes (Dennis) - Series of improvements and fixes to BFQ (Douglas, Paolo) - debugfs_create() return value check removal for drbd (Greg) - Use struct_size(), where appropriate (Gustavo) - Two lighnvm fixes (Heiner, Geert) - MD fixes, including a read balance and corruption fix (Guoqing, Marcos, Xiao, Yufen) - block opal shadow mbr additions (Jonas, Revanth) - sbitmap compare-and-exhange improvemnts (Pavel) - Fix for potential bio->bi_size overflow (Ming) - NVMe pull requests: - improved PCIe suspent support (Keith Busch) - error injection support for the admin queue (Akinobu Mita) - Fibre Channel discovery improvements (James Smart) - tracing improvements including nvmetc tracing support (Minwoo Im) - misc fixes and cleanups (Anton Eidelman, Minwoo Im, Chaitanya Kulkarni)" - Various little fixes and improvements to drivers and core" * tag 'for-5.3/block-20190708' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block: (153 commits) blk-iolatency: fix STS_AGAIN handling block: nr_phys_segments needs to be zero for REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES blk-mq: simplify blk_mq_make_request() blk-mq: remove blk_mq_put_ctx() sbitmap: Replace cmpxchg with xchg block: fix .bi_size overflow block: sed-opal: check size of shadow mbr block: sed-opal: ioctl for writing to shadow mbr block: sed-opal: add ioctl for done-mark of shadow mbr block: never take page references for ITER_BVEC direct-io: use bio_release_pages in dio_bio_complete block_dev: use bio_release_pages in bio_unmap_user block_dev: use bio_release_pages in blkdev_bio_end_io iomap: use bio_release_pages in iomap_dio_bio_end_io block: use bio_release_pages in bio_map_user_iov block: use bio_release_pages in bio_unmap_user block: optionally mark pages dirty in bio_release_pages block: move the BIO_NO_PAGE_REF check into bio_release_pages block: skd_main.c: Remove call to memset after dma_alloc_coherent block: mtip32xx: Remove call to memset after dma_alloc_coherent ...

Merge branch 'siginfo-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace

2019-07-09T04:48:15+00:00

Pull force_sig() argument change from Eric Biederman: "A source of error over the years has been that force_sig has taken a task parameter when it is only safe to use force_sig with the current task. The force_sig function is built for delivering synchronous signals such as SIGSEGV where the userspace application caused a synchronous fault (such as a page fault) and the kernel responded with a signal. Because the name force_sig does not make this clear, and because the force_sig takes a task parameter the function force_sig has been abused for sending other kinds of signals over the years. Slowly those have been fixed when the oopses have been tracked down. This set of changes fixes the remaining abusers of force_sig and carefully rips out the task parameter from force_sig and friends making this kind of error almost impossible in the future" * 'siginfo-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace: (27 commits) signal/x86: Move tsk inside of CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE in do_sigbus signal: Remove the signal number and task parameters from force_sig_info signal: Factor force_sig_info_to_task out of force_sig_info signal: Generate the siginfo in force_sig signal: Move the computation of force into send_signal and correct it. signal: Properly set TRACE_SIGNAL_LOSE_INFO in __send_signal signal: Remove the task parameter from force_sig_fault signal: Use force_sig_fault_to_task for the two calls that don't deliver to current signal: Explicitly call force_sig_fault on current signal/unicore32: Remove tsk parameter from __do_user_fault signal/arm: Remove tsk parameter from __do_user_fault signal/arm: Remove tsk parameter from ptrace_break signal/nds32: Remove tsk parameter from send_sigtrap signal/riscv: Remove tsk parameter from do_trap signal/sh: Remove tsk parameter from force_sig_info_fault signal/um: Remove task parameter from send_sigtrap signal/x86: Remove task parameter from send_sigtrap signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig_mceerr signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig signal: Remove task parameter from force_sigsegv ...

block: drbd: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2019-06-20T09:28:16+00:00

When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Philipp Reisner Cc: Lars Ellenberg Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

signal/drbd: Use send_sig not force_sig

2019-05-27T14:36:28+00:00

The drbd module exclusively sends signals to kernel threads it creates with kthread_create. These kernel threads do not block or ignore signals (only flush signals after they have been delivered), nor can drbd threads possibly be pid namespace init processes so the extra work that force_sig performs that send_sig does not is unnecessary. Further force_sig is for delivering synchronous signals (aka exceptions). The locking in force_sig is not prepared to deal with running processes, as tsk->sighand may change during exec for a running process. In short it is not only unnecessary for drbd to use force_sig it is semantically wrong. With drbd using send_sig it becomes easier to maintain force_sig as only synchronous signals need to be considered. Cc: Philipp Reisner Cc: Lars Ellenberg Cc: drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 91

2019-05-24T15:37:53+00:00

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 or at your option any later version [drbd] is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with [drbd] see the file copying if not write to the free software foundation 675 mass ave cambridge ma 02139 usa extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 16 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Allison Randal Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520075212.050796421@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

drbd: introduce P_ZEROES (REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES on the "wire")

2018-12-20T16:51:31+00:00

And also re-enable partial-zero-out + discard aligned. With the introduction of REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES, we started to use that for both WRITE_ZEROES and DISCARDS, hoping that WRITE_ZEROES would "do what we want", UNMAP if possible, zero-out the rest. The example scenario is some LVM "thin" backend. While an un-allocated block on dm-thin reads as zeroes, on a dm-thin with "skip_block_zeroing=true", after a partial block write allocated that block, that same block may well map "undefined old garbage" from the backends on LBAs that have not yet been written to. If we cannot distinguish between zero-out and discard on the receiving side, to avoid "undefined old garbage" to pop up randomly at later times on supposedly zero-initialized blocks, we'd need to map all discards to zero-out on the receiving side. But that would potentially do a full alloc on thinly provisioned backends, even when the expectation was to unmap/trim/discard/de-allocate. We need to distinguish on the protocol level, whether we need to guarantee zeroes (and thus use zero-out, potentially doing the mentioned full-alloc), or if we want to put the emphasis on discard, and only do a "best effort zeroing" (by "discarding" blocks aligned to discard-granularity, and zeroing only potential unaligned head and tail clippings to at least *try* to avoid "false positives" in an online-verify later), hoping that someone set skip_block_zeroing=false. For some discussion regarding this on dm-devel, see also https://www.mail-archive.com/dm-devel%40redhat.com/msg07965.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2018-January/msg00271.html For backward compatibility, P_TRIM means zero-out, unless the DRBD_FF_WZEROES feature flag is agreed upon during handshake. To have upper layers even try to submit WRITE ZEROES requests, we need to announce "efficient zeroout" independently. We need to fixup max_write_zeroes_sectors after blk_queue_stack_limits(): if we can handle "zeroes" efficiently on the protocol, we want to do that, even if our backend does not announce max_write_zeroes_sectors itself. Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

drbd: centralize printk reporting of new size into drbd_set_my_capacity()

2018-12-20T16:51:29+00:00

Previously, some implicit resizes that happend during handshake have not been reported as prominently as explicit resize. Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe

block: remove the lock argument to blk_alloc_queue_node

2018-11-15T19:13:35+00:00

With the legacy request path gone there is no real need to override the queue_lock. Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe