<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/arch/um/kernel/signal.c, branch dev</title>
<subtitle>Intel OpenBMC Linux kernel source tree (mirror)</subtitle>
<id>https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/atom?h=dev</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/atom?h=dev'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2014-08-06T11:03:41+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>um: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()</title>
<updated>2014-08-06T11:03:41+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Richard Weinberger</name>
<email>richard@nod.at</email>
</author>
<published>2013-10-06T19:57:10+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=307627eebbb0bc41b21e74d78b932362a6c1b38d'/>
<id>urn:sha1:307627eebbb0bc41b21e74d78b932362a6c1b38d</id>
<content type='text'>
Use the more generic functions get_signal() signal_setup_done()
for signal delivery.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger &lt;richard@nod.at&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>um: siginfo cleanup</title>
<updated>2013-07-19T09:31:36+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Richard Weinberger</name>
<email>richard@nod.at</email>
</author>
<published>2013-07-19T09:31:36+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=9a8c1359571c5d5e2fbc43cf457a6486b70a70cb'/>
<id>urn:sha1:9a8c1359571c5d5e2fbc43cf457a6486b70a70cb</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently we use both struct siginfo and siginfo_t.
Let's use struct siginfo internally to avoid ongoing
compiler warning. We are allowed to do so because
struct siginfo and siginfo_t are equivalent.

Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger &lt;richard@nod.at&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>x86,um: switch to generic old sigsuspend()</title>
<updated>2013-02-03T23:16:26+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Al Viro</name>
<email>viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk</email>
</author>
<published>2012-12-25T21:09:20+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=15ce1f7154c80693cec4f8a5309e8c8a06fb2541'/>
<id>urn:sha1:15ce1f7154c80693cec4f8a5309e8c8a06fb2541</id>
<content type='text'>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro &lt;viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>introduce generic sys_sigaltstack(), switch x86 and um to it</title>
<updated>2012-12-19T23:07:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Al Viro</name>
<email>viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk</email>
</author>
<published>2012-12-14T19:09:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=6bf9adfc90370b695cb111116e15fdc0e1906270'/>
<id>urn:sha1:6bf9adfc90370b695cb111116e15fdc0e1906270</id>
<content type='text'>
Conditional on CONFIG_GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK; architectures that do not
select it are completely unaffected

Signed-off-by: Al Viro &lt;viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>um: get rid of pointless include "..." where include &lt;...&gt; will do</title>
<updated>2012-10-09T20:28:45+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Al Viro</name>
<email>viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk</email>
</author>
<published>2012-10-08T02:27:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=37185b33240870719b6b5913a46e6a441f1ae96f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:37185b33240870719b6b5913a46e6a441f1ae96f</id>
<content type='text'>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro &lt;viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk&gt;
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger &lt;richard@nod.at&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>um: let signal_delivered() do SIGTRAP on singlestepping into handler</title>
<updated>2012-09-27T16:04:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Al Viro</name>
<email>viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk</email>
</author>
<published>2012-09-06T17:39:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=f9a38eace4498a5e9f6d2cdfc879d5444edc3a5f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f9a38eace4498a5e9f6d2cdfc879d5444edc3a5f</id>
<content type='text'>
... rather than duplicating that in sigframe setup code (and doing that
inconsistently, at that)

Signed-off-by: Al Viro &lt;viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>new helper: signal_delivered()</title>
<updated>2012-06-01T16:58:52+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Al Viro</name>
<email>viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk</email>
</author>
<published>2012-04-28T06:04:15+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=efee984c27b67e3ebef40410f35671997441b57c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:efee984c27b67e3ebef40410f35671997441b57c</id>
<content type='text'>
Does block_sigmask() + tracehook_signal_handler();  called when
sigframe has been successfully built.  All architectures converted
to it; block_sigmask() itself is gone now (merged into this one).

I'm still not too happy with the signature, but that's a separate
story (IMO we need a structure that would contain signal number +
siginfo + k_sigaction, so that get_signal_to_deliver() would fill one,
signal_delivered(), handle_signal() and probably setup...frame() -
take one).

Signed-off-by: Al Viro &lt;viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>most of set_current_blocked() callers want SIGKILL/SIGSTOP removed from set</title>
<updated>2012-06-01T16:58:51+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Al Viro</name>
<email>viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk</email>
</author>
<published>2012-04-27T17:58:59+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=77097ae503b170120ab66dd1d547f8577193f91f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:77097ae503b170120ab66dd1d547f8577193f91f</id>
<content type='text'>
Only 3 out of 63 do not.  Renamed the current variant to __set_current_blocked(),
added set_current_blocked() that will exclude unblockable signals, switched
open-coded instances to it.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro &lt;viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pull clearing RESTORE_SIGMASK into block_sigmask()</title>
<updated>2012-06-01T16:58:49+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Al Viro</name>
<email>viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk</email>
</author>
<published>2012-05-22T03:42:15+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=a610d6e672d6d3723e8da257ad4a8a288a8f2f89'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a610d6e672d6d3723e8da257ad4a8a288a8f2f89</id>
<content type='text'>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro &lt;viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>new helper: sigmask_to_save()</title>
<updated>2012-06-01T16:58:48+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Al Viro</name>
<email>viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk</email>
</author>
<published>2012-05-02T13:59:21+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/commit/?id=b7f9a11a6cf1ea9ee6be3eb2b90d91327a09ad14'/>
<id>urn:sha1:b7f9a11a6cf1ea9ee6be3eb2b90d91327a09ad14</id>
<content type='text'>
replace boilerplate "should we use -&gt;saved_sigmask or -&gt;blocked?"
with calls of obvious inlined helper...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro &lt;viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
