BMC/Intel-BMC/linux.git/arch/s390/oprofile/init.c, branch dev

s390/oprofile: fix compile error

2015-07-01T07:34:39+00:00

Fix these errors when compiling with CONFIG_OPROFILE=y and CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=n: arch/s390/oprofile/init.c: In function ‘oprofile_hwsampler_start’: arch/s390/oprofile/init.c:93:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_reserve_sampling' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] retval = perf_reserve_sampling(); ^ arch/s390/oprofile/init.c:99:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_release_sampling' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] perf_release_sampling(); ^ Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

s390: remove 31 bit support

2015-03-25T10:49:33+00:00

Remove the 31 bit support in order to reduce maintenance cost and effectively remove dead code. Since a couple of years there is no distribution left that comes with a 31 bit kernel. The 31 bit kernel also has been broken since more than a year before anybody noticed. In addition I added a removal warning to the kernel shown at ipl for 5 minutes: a960062e5826 ("s390: add 31 bit warning message") which let everybody know about the plan to remove 31 bit code. We didn't get any response. Given that the last 31 bit only machine was introduced in 1999 let's remove the code. Anybody with 31 bit user space code can still use the compat mode. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

s390/perf,oprofile: Share sampling facility

2013-12-16T13:37:52+00:00

Introduce reserve/release functions to share the sampling facility between perf and oprofile. Also improve error handling for the sampling facility support in perf. Signed-off-by: Hendrik Brueckner Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

oprofilefs_create_...() do not need superblock argument

2013-09-04T02:52:48+00:00

same story as with oprofilefs_mkdir() Signed-off-by: Al Viro

oprofilefs_mkdir() doesn't need superblock argument

2013-09-04T02:52:47+00:00

it's always equal to ->d_sb of the second argument (parent dentry), due to either being literally that, or ->d_sb of parent's parent. Signed-off-by: Al Viro

oprofile: don't bother with passing superblock to ->create_files()

2013-09-04T02:52:46+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

s390: add support for IBM zBC12 machine

2013-07-26T11:25:21+00:00

Just add the new model number where appropiate. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.10 Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky

oprofile, s390: Add support for IBM zEnterprise EC12

2013-04-06T13:25:42+00:00

This patch adds support for the latest release of the IBM mainframe series - the IBM zEnterprise EC12 (zEC12). The CPU measurement facility didn't change. So only the new CPU type has to be tolerated. Signed-off-by: Andreas Krebbel Signed-off-by: Robert Richter

oprofile, s390: Fix uninitialized memory access when writing to oprofilefs

2012-08-27T12:49:23+00:00

If oprofilefs_ulong_from_user() is called with count equals zero, *val remains unchanged. Depending on the implementation it might be uninitialized. Fixing users of oprofilefs_ulong_ from_user(). We missed these s390 changes with: 913050b oprofile: Fix uninitialized memory access when writing to writing to oprofilefs Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.3+ Signed-off-by: Robert Richter

s390/comments: unify copyright messages and remove file names

2012-07-20T09:15:04+00:00

Remove the file name from the comment at top of many files. In most cases the file name was wrong anyway, so it's rather pointless. Also unify the IBM copyright statement. We did have a lot of sightly different statements and wanted to change them one after another whenever a file gets touched. However that never happened. Instead people start to take the old/"wrong" statements to use as a template for new files. So unify all of them in one go. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens